Abstract
Some ideas for a new epistemology, encompassing practical action, based on the concept of reflective practice, are presented. The term reflective practitioner was first suggested by Schon (1983) in an analysis of the need to define the nature of practical competence. The prevailing culture of technical rationality, which depends on science for it rigor, is compared with that of the “wise engineer” promoted by Elms (1989). Worldview, quality, systems thinking, and responsibility are discussed as preliminaries to an analysis of reflective practice. The model is based on the passing of hierarchically structured sets of message patterns from perception to reflection to action. Intelligence is defined as an ability to construct, evaluate, and act on alternative scenarios of the future in the reflective phase. Design involves the construction of scenarios where imagined artifacts operate to achieve predefined needs for some defined person(s). Rigor for the reflective practitioner stems from the achieving of appropriate objectives. The similarities and differences between science and engineering become apparent when both are viewed as examples of reflective practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Avison DE, Fitzgerald G (1988), Information Systems and Development, Blackwell Scientific, Oxford
Barrett RA (1991), Culture and Conduct, Wadsworth, Belmont, California
Blockley DI (1980), The Nature of Structural Design and Safety, Ellis Horwood, Chichester
Blockley DI (1985), Reliability or Responsibility, Structural Safety, Vol 2, 273–280
Blockley DI (1989), Open World Problems in Structural Reliability, In Ang, Shinozuka, Schueller (Eds) Structural Safety and Reliability, Proc ICOSSAR '89, San Francisco, Vol 3, 1659–1665
Blockley DI, Henderson JR (1980), Structural Failures and the Growth of Engineering Knowledge, Proc. Instn. Civ. Engrs. Part 1, 68, November, 719–728
Checkland P (1981), Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, John Wiley, Chichester
Elms DG (1989), Wisdom Engineering—The Methodology of Versatility, Int J Appl Eng, Vol 5 No 6, 711–717
Koestler A (1967), The Ghost in the Machine, Picador, London
Penrose R (1990), The Emperor's New Mind, Vintage, London
Polanyi M (1958), Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, Univ. of Chicago Press
Schon D (1983), The Reflective Practitioner, Basic Books, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blockley, D.I. Engineering from reflective practice. Research in Engineering Design 4, 13–22 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02032389
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02032389