Skip to main content

Engineering from reflective practice

Abstract

Some ideas for a new epistemology, encompassing practical action, based on the concept of reflective practice, are presented. The term reflective practitioner was first suggested by Schon (1983) in an analysis of the need to define the nature of practical competence. The prevailing culture of technical rationality, which depends on science for it rigor, is compared with that of the “wise engineer” promoted by Elms (1989). Worldview, quality, systems thinking, and responsibility are discussed as preliminaries to an analysis of reflective practice. The model is based on the passing of hierarchically structured sets of message patterns from perception to reflection to action. Intelligence is defined as an ability to construct, evaluate, and act on alternative scenarios of the future in the reflective phase. Design involves the construction of scenarios where imagined artifacts operate to achieve predefined needs for some defined person(s). Rigor for the reflective practitioner stems from the achieving of appropriate objectives. The similarities and differences between science and engineering become apparent when both are viewed as examples of reflective practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Avison DE, Fitzgerald G (1988), Information Systems and Development, Blackwell Scientific, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett RA (1991), Culture and Conduct, Wadsworth, Belmont, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Blockley DI (1980), The Nature of Structural Design and Safety, Ellis Horwood, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Blockley DI (1985), Reliability or Responsibility, Structural Safety, Vol 2, 273–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blockley DI (1989), Open World Problems in Structural Reliability, In Ang, Shinozuka, Schueller (Eds) Structural Safety and Reliability, Proc ICOSSAR '89, San Francisco, Vol 3, 1659–1665

    Google Scholar 

  • Blockley DI, Henderson JR (1980), Structural Failures and the Growth of Engineering Knowledge, Proc. Instn. Civ. Engrs. Part 1, 68, November, 719–728

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (1981), Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, John Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Elms DG (1989), Wisdom Engineering—The Methodology of Versatility, Int J Appl Eng, Vol 5 No 6, 711–717

    Google Scholar 

  • Koestler A (1967), The Ghost in the Machine, Picador, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose R (1990), The Emperor's New Mind, Vintage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M (1958), Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, Univ. of Chicago Press

  • Schon D (1983), The Reflective Practitioner, Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blockley, D.I. Engineering from reflective practice. Research in Engineering Design 4, 13–22 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02032389

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02032389

Keywords

  • Reflection
  • Technical Rationality
  • Alternative Scenario
  • System Thinking
  • Practical Action