Clinical Rheumatology

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 210–220 | Cite as

A comparison of diflunisal and phenylbutazone in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis

  • M. J. A. M. Franssen
  • F. W. J. Gribnau
  • L. B. A. Van De Putte


A 12-week double-blind randomized drug trial followed by an open extension period of 36 weeks was carried out in 38 male patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) to compare the efficacy and safety of diflunisal (500 mg twice daily) and phenylbutazone (200 mg twice daily). Both drugs proved to be effective in improving the severity of symptoms associated with AS, and this improvement was maintained throughout the open extension period. Initially diflunisal had a more pronounced and rapid analgesic action, whereas phenylbutazone was more effective in increasing axial mobility. During the study 9 patients dropped out: 3 in each treatment group due to side effects and 1 in each group due to lack of efficacy; another patient was lost to follow-up. The two drugs were similarly safe as judged by the occurrence of adverse clinical effects, mainly gastrointestinal. This study again demonstrates the value of phenylbutazone in AS but, taking into account the possible haematological side effects, the use of other NSAIDs is stressed. Diflunisal is an alternative capable of improving the painful stiffness associated with AS.

Key words

Ankylosing Spondylitis Drug Trial Diflunisal Phenylbutazone 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Boersma, J.W. Retardation of ossification of the lumbar vertebral column in ankylosing spondylitis by means of phenylbutazone. Scand J Rheumatol 1976, 5, 60–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vthovac, B. Phenylbutazon and related compounds. In: Meyler's Side Effects of Drugs, 10th ed. Editor: Dukes M.N.G. Amsterdam, Elsevier 1984, 153–6.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Calabro, J.J., Amante, C.M. Indomethacin in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum, 1968, 11, 56–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hill, H.E.H., Hill, A.G.D. Ankylosing spondylitis: open long-term and double-blind crossover studies with naproxen. J Clin Pharmacol, 1975, 15, 355–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ansell, B.M., Mayor, G., Liyanage et al. A comparative study of butacote and naprosyn in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis, 1978, 37, 436–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Godfrey, R.G., Calabro, J.J., Mills, D. et al. A double-blind crossover trial of aspirin, indomethacin and phenylbutazone in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum, 1972, 15, 110 (abstract).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brogden, R.N., Heel, R.C., Pakes, G.E. et al. Diflunisal: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in pain and musculoskeletal strains and strains and pain in osteoarthritis. Drugs, 1980, 19, 84–106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brooks, P.M., Dougan, M.A., Thomas, D., Hills, L.J., Smith, P.J. Naproxen and diflunisal in osteoarthritis. Rheumatol Rehabil, 1982, 21, 95–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huskisson, E.C., Dieppe, P.A., Scott, I., Jones, H. Diclofenac sodium, diflunisal and naproxen: patient preferences for anti-inflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Rehabil, 1982, 21, 238–242.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van Loenhout, J.W.A., van de Putte, L.B.A., Gribnau, F.W.J., MacRae, K.D., Van Ginneken, C.A.M. Long-term clinical trial with naproxen sodium versus diflunisal in rheumatoid arthritis. M.D. thesis 1981, Nijmegen, pp. 43–60.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ferraccioli, G., Spisni, A., Ambarelli, K. Hypouricemic action of diflunisal in gouty patients: in vitro and in vivo studies. J Rheumatol, 1984, 11, 330–332.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bennet, P.H.J., Burch, T.A. Population studies of the rheumatic diseases. Amsterdam, Excerpta Medica Foundation 1968, pp 456–457.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Steinbrocker, O., Traeger, C.H., Batterman, R.C. Ara functional class. JAMA, 1949, 140, 659–65.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moll, J.H.M., Wright, V. An objective clinical study of chest expansion. Ann Rheum Dis, 1972, 31, 1–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Van Adrichem, J.A.M., Van der Korst, J.K. Assessment of the flexibility of the lumbar spine. Scand J Rheumatol, 1973, 2, 87–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Quanjer, Ph.H., Dalhuysen, A., van Zomeren, B.C. Summary equations of reference values. In: Clin Resp Phys. Editor P.M. Quanjer, 1985, 19, (suppl 5), 49.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Forbes, J.A., Beaver, W.T., White, E.H., White, R.W., Neilson, G.B., Shackleford, R.W. Diflunisal — a new oral analgesic with an unusually long term duration of action. JAMA, 1982, 248, 2139–2142.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Josenhans, W.T., Wang, C.S., Josenhans, C., Woodbury, J.F.C. Diaphragmatic contribution to ventilation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Respiration, 1971, 28, 331–346.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wasner, C., Britton, M.C., Kraines, R.G., Kaye, R.C., Bobrore, A.M., Fries, J.F. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. JAMA, 1981, 246, 2168–2172.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rheinberger, K. Efficacy and tolerance of diclofenac and indomethacin in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Therapiewoche, 1976, 26, 2916–2920.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Calin, A., Grahame, R. Double-blind cross-over trial of flurbiprofen and phenylbutazone in ankylosing spondylitis. Br Med J, 1974, 4, 496–499.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Romberg, O. Comparison of piroxicam with indomethacin in ankylosing spondylitis. A double-blind cross-over trial. Am J Med, 1982, 73 (suppl), 58–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. J. A. M. Franssen
    • 1
  • F. W. J. Gribnau
    • 2
  • L. B. A. Van De Putte
    • 1
  1. 1.Divisions of RheumatologyUniversity Hospital St. RadboudNijmegenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Clinical PharmacologyUniversity Hospital St. RadboudNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations