A comparison of diflunisal and phenylbutazone in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis
A 12-week double-blind randomized drug trial followed by an open extension period of 36 weeks was carried out in 38 male patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) to compare the efficacy and safety of diflunisal (500 mg twice daily) and phenylbutazone (200 mg twice daily). Both drugs proved to be effective in improving the severity of symptoms associated with AS, and this improvement was maintained throughout the open extension period. Initially diflunisal had a more pronounced and rapid analgesic action, whereas phenylbutazone was more effective in increasing axial mobility. During the study 9 patients dropped out: 3 in each treatment group due to side effects and 1 in each group due to lack of efficacy; another patient was lost to follow-up. The two drugs were similarly safe as judged by the occurrence of adverse clinical effects, mainly gastrointestinal. This study again demonstrates the value of phenylbutazone in AS but, taking into account the possible haematological side effects, the use of other NSAIDs is stressed. Diflunisal is an alternative capable of improving the painful stiffness associated with AS.
Key wordsAnkylosing Spondylitis Drug Trial Diflunisal Phenylbutazone
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Vthovac, B. Phenylbutazon and related compounds. In: Meyler's Side Effects of Drugs, 10th ed. Editor: Dukes M.N.G. Amsterdam, Elsevier 1984, 153–6.Google Scholar
- 6.Godfrey, R.G., Calabro, J.J., Mills, D. et al. A double-blind crossover trial of aspirin, indomethacin and phenylbutazone in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum, 1972, 15, 110 (abstract).Google Scholar
- 10.Van Loenhout, J.W.A., van de Putte, L.B.A., Gribnau, F.W.J., MacRae, K.D., Van Ginneken, C.A.M. Long-term clinical trial with naproxen sodium versus diflunisal in rheumatoid arthritis. M.D. thesis 1981, Nijmegen, pp. 43–60.Google Scholar
- 12.Bennet, P.H.J., Burch, T.A. Population studies of the rheumatic diseases. Amsterdam, Excerpta Medica Foundation 1968, pp 456–457.Google Scholar
- 13.Steinbrocker, O., Traeger, C.H., Batterman, R.C. Ara functional class. JAMA, 1949, 140, 659–65.Google Scholar
- 16.Quanjer, Ph.H., Dalhuysen, A., van Zomeren, B.C. Summary equations of reference values. In: Clin Resp Phys. Editor P.M. Quanjer, 1985, 19, (suppl 5), 49.Google Scholar
- 20.Rheinberger, K. Efficacy and tolerance of diclofenac and indomethacin in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Therapiewoche, 1976, 26, 2916–2920.Google Scholar