Skip to main content
Log in

Exploitation of natural resources and pollution

Some differential game models

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides some differential game models of natural resource exploitation when environmental pollution takes place. The “classical” approach to determine optimal harvest rates of renewable resources utilizes Optimal Control models, i.e. there is either a monopolistic market structure or there is pure competition. In case of pollution, however, all agents can be put together, forming the groups of the resource harvesters on one side and of polluters on the other side. So differential games can be used to analyze environmental problems. The models introduced in this paper are put together in order to showdifferent problems that can all be analyzed using differential games.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. Basar and G.J. Olsder,Dynamic Noncooperative Game Theory (Academic Press, London/New York/Paris, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Clark,Mathematical Bioeconomics (Wiley Interscience, New York, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Clark, Restricted access to common-property fishery resources: A game theoretic analysis, in:Dynamic Optimization and Mathematical Economics, ed. T. Liu (Plenum Press, New York, 1980) pp. 117–132.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Clemhout and H. Wan, Dynamic common-property resources and environmental problems, J. Optim. Theory Appl. 46(1985)471–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Clemhout and H. Wan, Environmental problems as a common-property resource game, in:Dynamic Games in Economic Analysis, ed. Hämäläinen and Ehtamo (Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, 1991) pp. 132–154.

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. Dockner, G. Feichtinger and S. Jørgensen, Tractable classes of nonzero-sum open-loop Nash differential games: Theory and examples, J. Optim. Theory Appl. 45(1985)179–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. E. Dockner, G. Feichtinger and A. Mehlmann, Noncooperative solutions for a differential game model of fishery, J. Econ. Dyn. Control 13(1989)1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Feichtinger and R.F. Harti,Optimale Kontrolle ökonomischer Prozesse (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. Kaitala, M. Pohjola and O. Tahvonen, Transboundary air pollution between Finland and the USSR: A dynamic acid rain game, in:Dynamic Games in Economic Analysis, ed. Hämäläinen and Ehtamo (Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, 1991) pp. 183–192.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.F. Reinganum and N.L. Stokey, Oligopoly extraction of a common property natural resource: The importance of the period of committment in dynamic games, Int. Econ. Rev. 26(1985)161–173.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Selten, Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games, Int. J. Game Theory 4(1975)25–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. W.J. Ströbele, The optimal intertemporal decision in industrial production and harvesting a renewable natural resource, J. Econ. 48(1988)375–388.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schäfer, M. Exploitation of natural resources and pollution. Ann Oper Res 54, 237–262 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02031736

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02031736

Keywords

Subject classification

Navigation