Annals of Operations Research

, Volume 54, Issue 1, pp 175–202 | Cite as

Process models of environmental systems: Simulation of forest development dynamics as an example

  • Hartmut Bossel


Successful management and stewardship of environmental systems requires reliable assessment of their development dynamics in response to changing environmental and management conditions. Descriptive (statistical) models cannot cope with this challenge since their development is based on historical time series with little or no reference to actual system structure. On the other hand, explanatory (process) models attempt to capture the essential eco-physiological processes determining dynamic behavior, and they are therefore much better suited for the computation of development dynamics under changing conditions, even when long-term empirical observations are not possible or feasible. As an example of the use of process models in environmental systems analysis, a forest simulation model describing growth, and carbon and nitrogen dynamics of a single-species, even-aged forest stand under silvicultural management and pollution influences is presented, together with some representative simulation results. Steps in obtaining valid but compact tree models for complex forest simulations are outlined, and recent software developments (object-oriented programming) are assessed with respect to their potential for environmental systems analysis.


System dynamics forest development 

Subject classification

JEL C44 Q23 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    G.I. Agren and B. Axelsson, PT — a tree growth model, in:Structure and Functions of Northern Coniferous Forests — An Ecosystem Study, ed. T. Persson, Ecol. Bull. (Stockholm) 32(1980)525–536.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    H. Bossel, Dynamics of forest dieback: Systems analysis and simulation, Ecol. Mod. 34(1986)259–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    H. Bossel, Ecodynamics as a function of ecosystem structure: Forest dieback as an example, in:Ecodynamics — Contributions to Theoretical Ecology, ed. W. Wolff, C.J. Soeder and F.R. Drepper (Springer, Berlin, 1988) pp. 244–257.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    H. Bossel, Modelling forest dynamics: Moving from description to explanation, Forest Ecol. Manag. 42(1991)129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    H. Bossel,Modellbildung und Simulation (Vieweg Verlag, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden, 1992/1994), with diskette.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    H. Bossel,Modeling and Simulation (A.K. Peters, Wellesley, MA, 1994), with diskette.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    H. Bossel and H. Krieger, Simulation model of natural tropical forest dynamics, Ecol. Mod. 59(1991)37–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    H. Bossel and H. Krieger, Simulation of multi-species tropical forest dynamics using a vertically and horizontally structured model, Forest Ecol. Manag. 69(1994)123–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    H. Bossel, H. Krieger, H. Schäfer and N. Trost, Simulation of forest stand dynamics, using real-structure process models, Forest Ecol. Manag. 42(1991)3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    H. Bossel and H. Schäfer, Generic simulation model of forest growth, carbon and nitrogen dynamics, Ecol. Mod. 48(1989)221–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [10a]
    H. Bossel, TREEDYN3 Forest Simulation Model: Mathematical model, program documentation, and simulation results, Berichte des Forschungszentrums Waldökosysteme, Reihe B, Bd. 35, Göttingen (1994).Google Scholar
  12. [11]
    E.F. Bruenig, The forest ecosystem — tropical and boreal, Ambio 16(1987)68–79.Google Scholar
  13. [11a]
    J. France and J.H.M. Thornley,Mathematical Models in Agriculture (Butterworths, London, 1984).Google Scholar
  14. [12]
    M.R. Fulton, A computationally efficient forest succession model: Design and initial tests, Forest Ecol. Manag. 42(1991)23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [13]
    P. Hari, L. Kaipiainen, E. Kopilahti, A. Mäkelä, T. Nilson, P. Oker-Blom, J. Ross and R. Salminen, Structure, radiation and photosynthetic production in coniferous stands, Research Note No. 54, Department of Silviculture, University of Helsinki (1985).Google Scholar
  16. [14]
    G.E. Host, Causal models, empirical data, and a brief philosophy of science, IUFRO Newsletter no. 16 (S6.02.1) (1988) pp. 20–22.Google Scholar
  17. [15]
    S. Kellomäki and H. Väisänen, Application of a gap model for the simulation of forest ground vegetation in boreal conditions, Forest Ecol. Manag. 42(1991)35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [16]
    F. Klienast, FORECE — A forest succession model for southern central Europe, ORNL/TM-10575, Publ. No. 2980, Environ. Sci. Div., Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1987).Google Scholar
  19. [17]
    T. Kolström, Modelling early development of a planted pine stand: An application of object-oriented programming, Forest Ecol. Manag. 42(1991)63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [18]
    J.J. Landsberg,Physiological Ecology of Forest Production (Academic Press, London, 1986), in particular, chap. 8: Synthesis, pp. 165–178.Google Scholar
  21. [19]
    G. Lorenz, A. Uhrmacher, K.H. Simon and H. Bossel, Application of artificial intelligence methods to the representation and modelling of tree growth, in:Intelligence and Growth Models for Forest Management Decisions, ed. H.E, Burckhardt, H.M. Rauscher and K. Johann, Publ. No. FWS-1-89, Virginia Polytech. Inst. Sch. For. Wildl. Resour. (1989).Google Scholar
  22. [20]
    G.M.J. Mohren, Simulation of forest growth, applied to Douglas fir stands in The Netherlands, Ph.D. Thesis, Agricultural University, Wageningen (1987).Google Scholar
  23. [21]
    G.M.J. Mohren and F. Kienast,Modelling Forest Succession in Europe, Special issue of Forest Ecol. Manag. 42(1991).Google Scholar
  24. [22]
    R. Muetzelfeldt et al., A specification for a framework for forest modelling, final document of a Workshop of European Forest Modellers, University of Edinburgh (1987).Google Scholar
  25. [23]
    R. Muetzelfeldt, D. Robertson, A. Bundy and M. Uschold, The use ofProlog for improving the rigour and accessibility of ecological modelling, Working paper, Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Edinburgh (1987).Google Scholar
  26. [24]
    R.A.A. Oldeman, Forest ecology for silvicultural design, 3 vols., Department of Silviculture and Forest Ecology, Agricultural University, Wageningen (1987).Google Scholar
  27. [25]
    F.W.T. Penning de Vries and H.H. van Laar (eds.),Simulation of Plant Growth and Crop Production (Pudoc Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, 1982).Google Scholar
  28. [26]
    M. Rauscher, Comparing empirical and explanatory models, IUFRO Newsletter no. 9 (S6.01.1) (1987).Google Scholar
  29. [27]
    M. Rauscher, Comparing empirical and explanatory models — revisited, IUFRO Newsletter no. 16 (S6.02.1) (1988) 15–18.Google Scholar
  30. [28]
    M.H. Rauscher and J.G. Isebrands, Using expert systems to model tree development, in:Proc. IUFRO Forest Simulation Systems Conf., University of California, Berkeley, ed. C. Wendell and J.S. Biging, Div. Agric. Nat. Resour. Bull. 1927, Univ. Calif., Berkeley (1988) pp. 129–138.Google Scholar
  31. [29]
    O. Richter,Simulation des Verhaltens ökologischer Systeme (VCH Weinheim, Germany, 1985).Google Scholar
  32. [30]
    S.W. Running and J.C. Coughlan, A general model of forest ecosystem processes for regional applications. I: Hydrologic balance, canopy gas exchange and primary production processes, Ecol. Mod. 42(1988)125–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [31]
    H. Schäfer, H. Krieger and H. Bossel, Process-oriented models for simulation of growth dynamics of tropical natural and plantation trees, in:Tropical Forests in Transition, ed. J.G. Goldammer (Birkhäuser, Basel, 1992) pp. 191–224.Google Scholar
  34. [32]
    H.H. Shugart,Theory of Forest Dynamics (Springer, New York, 1984).Google Scholar
  35. [33]
    H.H. Shugart and S.W. Seagle, Modeling forest landscapes and the role of disturbances in ecosystems and communities, in:The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics, ed. S.T.A. Pickett and P.S. White (Academic Press, New York, 1985) pp. 353–368.Google Scholar
  36. [34]
    R. Sievänen, T.E. Burk and A.R. Ek, Construction of a stand growth model utilizing photosynthesis and respiration relationships in individual trees, Can. J. For. Res. 18(1988)1027–1035.Google Scholar
  37. [35]
    R. Sievänen, P. Hari, P.J. Orava and P. Pelkonen, A model for the effect of photosynthate allocation and soil nitrogen on plant growth, Ecol. Mod. 41(1988)55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [36]
    A.M. Solomon, Transient response of forests to CO2-induced climate change: Simulation modelling experiments in eastern North America, Oecologia (Berlin) 68(1986)567–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [37]
    D.L. Urban, G.B. Bonan, T.M. Smith and H.H. Shugart, Spatial applications of gap models, Forest Ecol. Manag. 42(1991)95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© J.C. Baltzer AG, Science Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hartmut Bossel
    • 1
  1. 1.Environmental Systems Analysis GroupUniversity of KasselKasselGermany

Personalised recommendations