Skip to main content
Log in

Decision theoretic analysis of pollutant emission monitoring procedures

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A decision theoretic problem is considered which arises in the context of monitoring point sources of pollution: The management of an industrial plant may be authorized to release per unit time some amount of pollutants into the environment, for example air or water. An environmental agency may control, i.e. decide with the help of randomly sampled measurements, whether or not the real releases are larger than the permitted ones. The analysis of the problem of determining the “best” inspection procedure is performed with the help of a non-cooperative two-person game and can be constructed as follows: For a given value of the false alarm probability, only a zero-sum game has to be considered, where the probability of detecting illegal behavior is the payoff to the inspector. The solution of this game, i.e. the best inspection procedure, is then determined by use of the Neyman-Pearson Lemma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. Wicke,Umweltökomomie — Eine praxisorientierte Einführung, 2nd ed. (Verlag Franz Vahlen, München, 1989) pp. 214–221.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Avenhaus,Safeguards Systems Analysis (Plenum Press, New York/London, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Karmann, Principal-Agent-Modelle und Risikoallokation — Einige Grundprinzipien, Wirtschaftswiss. Studien 21, Heft. 11(1992)557–562.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. Segerson, Uncertainty and incentives for nonpoint pollution control, J. Env. Econ. Manag. 15(1988)87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. G.R. Russell, Game models for structuring monitoring and enforcement systems, Natural Resource Modeling 4(1990)143–173.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Avenhaus and A. Okada, Inspector leadership games with incomplete information, Discussion Paper 17 of the Zentrum für Interdisziplinäre Forschung an der Universität Bielefeld (July 1988).

  7. R. Selten, Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games, Int. J. Game Theory 4(1975)22–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. H. von Stackelberg,Marktform und Gleichgewicht (Springer, Berlin, 1934).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Maschler, A price leadership method for solving the inspector's non-constant-sum game, Nav. Res. Log. Quart. 13(1966)11–33.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Avenhaus and B. von Stengel, Verification of attribute and variables: Perfect equilibria and inspector leadership, in:Defense Decision Making, Analytical Support and Crisis Management, ed. R. Avenhaus, H. Karkar and M. Rudnianski (Springer, Heidelberg, 1991) pp. 296–317.

    Google Scholar 

  11. V.K. Rohatgi,An Introduction to Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics (Wiley, New York, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Avenhaus, H.-P. Battenberg and B.-J. Falkowski, Optimal tests for data verification, Oper. Res. 39(1991)341–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A Graßhoff, Überwachung punktförmiger Schadstoffquellen — Vergleich zweier statistischer Überwachungsprozeduren, Diplomarbeit, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (1991).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Avenhaus, R. Decision theoretic analysis of pollutant emission monitoring procedures. Ann Oper Res 54, 23–38 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02031725

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02031725

Keywords

Subject classification

Navigation