Skip to main content
Log in

Norfloxacin versus cotrimoxazole in the treatment of lower urinary tract infections

  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a randomised prospective study 61 patients with lower urinary tract infection received either 200 mg norfloxacin (33 patients) or 480 mg cotrimoxazole (28 patients) twice daily for ten days. Pathogens includedEscherichia coli in 48 patients,Proteus mirabilis in ten patients, andEnterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Citrobacter freundii andStaphylococcus saprophyticus in one patient each. The MICs of norfloxacin and cotrimoxazole were ⩽ 0.03 mg/l and ⩽ 1 mg/l respectively. On the tenth day of treatment 94 % of the patients receiving norfloxacin and 89 % of the patients receiving cotrimoxazole were clinically cured, and the pathogens were eradicated in 94 % and 96 % of the patients respectively. At six week follow-up one patient given cotrimoxazole and two given norfloxacin had a reinfection. No side-effects or toxicity were observed with the exception of a diffuse rash in one patient receiving cotrimoxazole in whom treatment was discontinued. It is concluded that norfloxacin is safe and as effective as cotrimoxazole in the treatment of lower UTI and should have an important role to play whenever multiresistant organisms are implicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Downs, J., Andriole, V. T., Ryan, J. L.: In vitro activity of MK-0366 against clinical urinary pathogens, including gentamicin-resistantPseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1982, 21: 670–672.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ito, A., Hirai, K., Inone, M., Koga, H., Suzue, S., Irijura, I., Misuhashi, S.: In vitro antibacterial activity of AM-715, a new nalidixic acid analog. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1980, 17: 103–108.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. King, A., Warren, C., Shannon, K., Phillips, I.: In vitro antibacterial activity of norfloxacin (MK-0366). Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1982, 21: 604–607.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Thomas, V., Shelokov, A., Forland, M.: Antibodycoated bacteria in the urine and site of urinary tract infection. New England Journal of Medicine 1974, 290: 588–590.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Washington, J. A., Sutter, V. L.: Dilution susceptibility test: agar and macro-broth dilution procedures. In: Lennette, E. H., Balows, A., Hausler, W. J., Truant, J. P. (ed.): Manual of clinical microbiology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C., 1980, p. 453–458.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Giamarellou, H., Jackson, G. G.: Antibacterial activity of cinoxacin in vitro. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1975: 688–692.

  7. Boppana, V. K., Swanson, B. N.: Determination of norfloxacin, a new nalidixic acid analog, in human serum and urine by high-performance liquid chromatography. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1982, 21: 808–810.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giamarellou, H., Tsagarakis, J., Petrikkos, G. et al. Norfloxacin versus cotrimoxazole in the treatment of lower urinary tract infections. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2, 266–269 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02029530

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02029530

Keywords

Navigation