Neohelicon

, Volume 3, Issue 1–2, pp 271–285 | Cite as

Notes on the critical procedure

  • Miroslav Beker
Ergasterium
  • 17 Downloads

Keywords

Comparative Literature Critical Procedure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Quoted fromForms of Modern Fiction, ed. William Van O'Connor (Indiana University Press, 1964), p. 33.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Helen Gardner,The Business of Criticism (London, 1959), p. 19.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ibidem. Helen Gardner,The Business of Criticism (London, 1959), p. 75.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. D. Hirsch,Validity in Interpretation (New Haven, 1967), p. 126.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jean Paul Sartre,What is Literature? (translated from the French by Bernard Frechtman), (New York, 1966), p. 45.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Geoffrey Tillotson,Tackeray the Novelist (Cambridge, 1954), p. 51.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. Hirsch,Validity in Interpretation (New Haven, 1967), p. 73.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Raymond Picard,Two Centuries of French Literature (London, 1970), p. 14.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    F. R. and Q. D. Leavis,Dickens the Novelist (London, 1970), p. 119.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Helen Gardner,The Business of Criticism (London, 1969), p. 10.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Quoted fromModern Criticism, ed. Walter Sutton and Richard Foster (New York, 1963), p. 341.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Quoted fromContemporary Criticism, ed. Malcolm Bradbury (London, 1970), p. 45.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miroslav Beker

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations