Skip to main content
Log in

Dramatic exposition and resolution in O'Neill, Williams, Miller, and Albee

  • Speculum
  • Published:
Neohelicon Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Eugene O'Neill,Days Without End, inThe Plays of Eugene O'Neill (New York: Random House, 1954), III, p. 553.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ibid., p. 567. Cf. Eugene O'Neill,Lazarus Laughed, inThe Plays of Eugene O'Neill, I, pp. 280, 366–371.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cf. Travis Bogard,Contour in Time: The Plays of Eugene O'Neill (New York: Oxford University Press, 1972), pp. 326–327; Virginia Floyd,Eugene O'Neill at Work: Newly Released Ideas for Plays (New York: Frederick Ungar Publishing Co., 1981), pp. 92–113.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eugene O'Neill,Long Day's Journey Into Night (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1969), p. 176.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tennessee Williams,The Glass Menagerie, inSweet Bird of Youth, A Streetcar Named Desire, The Glass Menagerie (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1948), p. 313.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Arthur Miller,Death of a Salesman: Text and Criticism ed. Gerald Weales (New York: The Viking Press, 1967), pp. 138–139.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid., p. 138.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid..

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid., 139.

    Google Scholar 

  10. At this juncture it is worth quoting Miller himself: “I am sorry the self-realization of the older son, Biff, is not a weightier counterbalance to Willy's disaster in the audience mind. ... to me the tragedy of Willy Loman is that he gave his life, or sold it, in order to justify the waste of it.” Artur Miller, “Tragedy and the Common Man”,ibid. Artur Miller, pp. 149, 150.

  11. Cf. J. W. Lambert, “Introduction” toNew English Dramatists 7 (Harmondsworth: Penguin Plays, 1963), p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Giles Cooper,Everything in the Garden, inNew English Dramatists 7, p. 221.

  13. Edward Albee,Everything in the Garden, inThe Plays IV (New York: Atheneum, 1982), p. 197.

    Google Scholar 

  14. When in his interview with Edward Albee (on 7 August, 1968) M. E. Rutenberg asked the playwright why he had cut the original ending ofEverything in the Garden for the Broadway presentation, Albee replied: “It was a last desperate moment because the way the play had been directed up to that particular point, the end wasn't working. I think that with a different directorial concept, the ending would have worked. Youwill notice that the published version of the play has the original ending, and the productions being done in stock and amateur and in Europe have my original ending.” Michael E. Rutenberg,Edward Albee: Playwright in Protest (New York: Avon Books, 1970), p. 229. Apparently, the conclusion did present a problem to both author, director and critic.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Edward Albee,Everything in the Garden, inThe Plays IV, p. 197.

  16. Ibid. Edward Albee,Everything in the Garden, inThe Plays IV, p. 198.

  17. Cf. Ronald Hayman,Edward Albee (London: Heinemann, 1971), p. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Edward Albee,Everything in the Garden, inThe Plays IV, p. 201.

  19. Edward Albee, “Which Theater Is the Absurd One?”, in Alvin B. Kernan (ed.),The Modern American Theater: A Collection of Critical Essays (Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1967), p. 173. Albee's dramatic practice often cuts across and goes beyond the scope of this witty paradox. Unlike Beckett, who inWaiting for Godot has created an openly absurd universe, in which the dramatic principle is ingeniously saved by referring the plight of inaction to the need for action; and unlike Pinter, who inThe Birthday Party and in a number of similar plays has brought about a pseudo-naturalistic world, where behind the seemingly solid crust of external reality absurdly irrational violence proves human action senseless and futile; in several of his plays includingWho's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? andEverything in the Garden Albee crossbreeds realistic and absurd drama in a characteristically American fusion. In these cases, however, realistic drama is not a well-made Broadway farce, melodrama or musical, but serious drama with a critical intent and a cathartic action.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cf. Charles S. Krohn and Julian N. Wasserman, “An Interview with Edward Albee, March 18, 1981”, in Julian N. Wasserman (ed.),Edward Albee: An Interview and Essays (Houston, Texas: The University of St. Thomas, 1983), p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cf. Michael E. Rutenberg,Edward Albee: Playwright in Protest, p. 171.

  22. Or, as Albee himself names the process, writing “the American version of that particular English play”,Ibid. Edward Albee: Playwright in Protest, p. 229.

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Egri, P. Dramatic exposition and resolution in O'Neill, Williams, Miller, and Albee. Neohelicon 19, 175–184 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02028617

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02028617

Keywords

Navigation