Skip to main content
Log in

The validity of using a single soybean variety to evaluate the growth regulatory activity of chemicals

  • Published:
Journal of Plant Growth Regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forty six soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) varieties were evaluated for their vegetative response to a foliar application of abscisic acid, benzyladenine, or o-methoxyphenyl phosphinic acid (OMPA). Varietal responses to each chemical ranged from no effect to severe growth retardation. When the same varieties were evaluated for their response to water stress, the length of time required for severe wilting ranged from 48 h to 120 h. A cluster analysis was used to relate the coefficient of parentage of the varieties with their response to chemicals or water stress. The response of a variety to one of the chemicals did not predict the response to a different chemical. Further, the response of a variety to a chemical did not predict the response of a similar variety to the same chemical. The water stress rating was neither related to the chemical responses nor to the coefficient of parentage for the varieties in the test. The effects of night interruption and darkness were more pronounced on northern than on southern varieties, analogous with the pattern of reproductive regulation by photoperiod.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

OMPA:

o-methoxyphenyl phosphinic acid.

References

  • DeWilde RC (1971) Practical applications of (2-chloromethyl) phosphonic acid in agricultural production Hort Sci 6:364–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon WJ (1983) BMDP Statistical software. University of California Berkeley Press, appendix A.37, p 693

  • Fehr WR, Caviness CE (1977) Stages of soybean development. Special report 80, Cooperative Extension, Iowa State University

  • Fribourg HA, Johnson IJ (1955) Response of soybean strains to 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T. Agron J 47:171–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymowitz T, Carmer SG, Newell CA (1976) Soybean cultivars released in the United States and Canada: morphological descriptions and responses to selected foliar, stem and root diseases. Internat Ag Pub, INSOY series 9

  • Jung J, Rademacher W (1983) Plant growth regulatory chemicals: cereal grains. In: Nickell LG (ed) Plant growth regulatory chemicals, volume I. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 255–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickell LG (1976) Chemical growth regulation in sugar cane. Outlook on Agriculture 9:57–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne RC, Koszykowski TJ (1977) Differentiation of soybean cultivars by metribuzin sensitivity. J Seed Tech 2:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabacky MJ (1978) Herbicidal use of substituted phenyl phosphinic acids. US Patent 4, 130, 410, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderhoef LN, Stahl CA (1975) Separation of two responses to auxin by means of cytokinin inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci 72:1822–1825

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wax LM, Bernard RL, Hayes RM (1974) Response of soybean cultivars to bentazon, bromoxynil, chloroxuron and 2,4-DB. Weed Sci 22:35–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams CN, Raghavan V (1966) Effects of light and growth substances on the diurnal leaf movements of Mimosa pudica. JEB 17:742–749

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright STC, Hiron RWP (1969) (+)-Abscisic acid, the growth inhibitor induced in detached wheat leaves by a period of wilting. Nature (London) 224:719–720

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nelson, D.R., Muskopf, Y.M. The validity of using a single soybean variety to evaluate the growth regulatory activity of chemicals. J Plant Growth Regul 5, 49–57 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02027386

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02027386

Keywords

Navigation