Abstract
This paper analyzes the relationship between age and productivity for Nobel prize winners in science during the period 1901–1992. The relationship found is field dependent as well as dependent upon the definition used to measure the age at which the ward-winning work was done. The results suggest that although it does not require extraordinary youth to do prizewinning work, the odds decrease markedly in mid-life and fall off precipitously after age 50, particularly in chemistry and physics. The discussion underscores the problem of drawing conclusions about the age structure of research by examining medians instead of the entire distribution.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H. Zuckerman,The Scientific Elite, Free Press, New York, 1977.
S. Brodetsky, Newton: Scientist and Man,Nature, 150 (1942) 698–699.
L. Wolpert, A. Richards,A Passion for Science, Oxford University Press, New York, 1988.
P. Stephan, S. Levin,Striking the Mother Lode in Science: The Importance of Age, Place and Time, Oxford University Press, New York, 1992.
R. Albert, Identity, experiences and career choice among the exceptionally gifted and eminent, in:Theories of Creativity,M. Runco,R. Albert, (Eds) Sage, Newbury Park, CA. 1990, p. 13–34.
M. Runco, Implicit theories and ideational creativity, in:Theories of Creativity,M. Runco,R. Albert, (Eds) Sage, Newbury Park, CA., 1990, p. 234–252.
F. Barron, D. Harrington, Creativity, intelligence, and personality,Annual Reviews of Psychology, 32 (1981), 439–476.
K. Schaie, Age changes in adult intelligence, in:Aging: Scientific Perspectives and Social Disease, 2nd ed.,D. Woodruff, J. Birren, (Eds) Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA., 1983, p. 137–148.
J. Watson,The Double Helix, Atheneum, New York, 1968.
G. M. Beard,Legal Responsibility in Old Age, Russell New York, 1874.
H. Zuckerman, R. Merton, Age, aging, and age structure in science, in:The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations,N. Storer, (Ed.) University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1973, p. 497–575.
D. K. Simonton, Creative productivity and age: A mathematical model based on a two-step cognitive process,Developmental Review, 3 (1983) 97–111.
D. K. Simonton,Genius, Creativity, and Leadership, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1984.
A. Einstein unpublished manuscript forNature. Morgan Library, New York.
J. Blau, Sociometric structure of scientific discipline, in:Research in Sociology of Knowledge, Sciences and Art,R. Jones, (Ed) JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 1978, p. 191–206.
D. Hull,Science as a Process, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1988.
M. Fox, Publication productivity among scientists: A critical review,Social Studies of Science, 13 (1983) 285–305.
P. Allison, J. Long, T. Krauze, Cumulative advantage and inequality in science,American Sociological Review, 47 (1982) 615–625.
D. Levinson, The Mid-Life Transition: A period in adult psychosocial development,Psychiatry, 40 (1977) 99–112.
B. Neugarten, Adult personality: Towards a psychology of the life cycle, in:Middle Age and Aging: A Reader in Social Psychology,B. Neugarten, (Ed.) University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1968, p. 137–147.
H. Rosovsky,The University: An Owner's Manual, Norton, New York, 1990.
A. Diamond, An economic model of the life-cycle research productivity of scientists,Scientometrics 6 (1984) 189–196.
S. Levin, P. Stephan, Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists,American Economic Review, 81 (1991) 81:114–132.
E. Manniche, G. Falk, Age and the Nobel Prize,Behavioral Science, 2 (1957) 301–307.
T. Wasson,Nobel Winners: An H. W. Wilson Biographical Dictionary, Visual Education Corporation, Princeton, 1987.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stephan, P.E., Levin, S.G. Age and the Nobel prize revisited. Scientometrics 28, 387–399 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02026517
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02026517