Abstract
Studies of journal citation patterns suggest that specialty areas within disciplines may be the most appro priate structural units for understanding the social organization of science. Citation studies necessarily are limited to scientists who publish, however, and studies of all members of particular disciplines would provide more general specialty structure data. Accordingly, this research applied factor analytic procedures previously used in studies of the structure of specialization among psychologists to all members of the Population Association of America. Four principal components derived from the self-designated specialties of these population scientist were rotated to a final solution by the varimax procedure and were interpreted as measuring, respectively,Social Emphasis, Geographic Emphasis, Formal Emphasis, andEpidemiological Emphasis. These results partially confirm the distinction sometimes made by population scientists between social demography and formal demography, but suggest this typology is incomplete. The results also illustrate techniques that could provide a useful alternative to citation analysis for researchers studying specialty structures in other disciplines.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
D. CRANE,Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1972.
E. GARFIELD,Citation Indexing, Wiley, New York, 1979.
H. G. SMALL, Structural dynamics of scientific literature,International Classification, 3 (1976) 67–74.
L. L. HARGENS, N. C. MULLINS, P. K. HECHT, Research areas and stratification processes in science,Social Studies of Science, 10 (1980) 55–74.
H. G. SMALL, D. CRANE, Specialties and disciplines in science and social science,Scientometrics 1 (1979) 445–61.
H. D. WHITE, B. C. GRIFFITH, Author co-citation: A literature measure of intellectual structure,Journal of the American Society For Information Science, 32 (1981) 163–71.
H. G. SMALL, Co-citation in the scientific literature,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24 (1973) 265–9.
G. PINSKI, F. NARIN, Structure of the psychology literature,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 30 (1979) 161–8.
D. C. ADKINS, The simple structure of the American Psychological Association,American Psychologist, 9 (1954) 175–80.
D. C. ADKINS, A simpler structure of the American Psychological Association,American Psychologist, 28 (1973) 47–54.
Directory of Members, Washington: Population Association of America, 1980, 1981.
B. J. WINER, A measure of interrelationship for overlapping groups,Psychometrika, 20 (1955) 63–8.
W. R. ZWICK, W. F. VELICER, Factors influencing four rules for determining the number of components to retain,Multivariate Behavioral Research, 17 (1982) 253–69.
R. B. CATTELL, The scree test for the number of factors,Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1 (1966) 245–76.
J. L. HOLLAND,Making Vocational Choices: A theory of Carrers, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1973.
C. KISER, The role of the Milbank Memorial Fund in the early history of the Association,Population Index, 47 (1981) 490–4.
F. LORIMER, How the demographers save the Association,Population Index, 47 (1981) 488–90.
A. S. LUNDE, The beginning of the Population Association of America,Population Index, 47 (1981) 479–84.
F. W. NOTESTEIN, Memories of the early years of the Association,Population Index, 47 (1981) 484–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Richards, J.M. Structure of specialization among American population scientists. Scientometrics 6, 425–432 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02025829
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02025829
Keywords
- Social Organization
- Analytic Procedure
- Structural Unit
- Final Solution
- American Population