Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation in animals of a system to estimate tracheal pressure from the endotracheal tube cuff

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective. Flow through an endotracheal tube (ETT) causes a pressure loss across the tube. This loss results in a difference between pressure measured at the airway and pressure measured in the trachea. This difference can lead to errors when calculating pulmonary mechanics and when setting ventilators. We have tested a method of estimating tracheal pressure from the pressure in the ETT cuff.Methods. Pressure transducers were placed in the proximal ETT connector, in the trachea, and in the ETT cuff (through the inflation port). Instantaneous periods of zero flow, detected with a flow meter, were used to calculate the slope and offset of the line relating cuff pressure to tracheal pressure. The system was tested on the bench using a ventilator and lung simulator and in 2 dogs and 5 pigs. Tests were performed at various cuff pressures, trachea diameters, ETT sizes, respiratory rates, tidal volumes, and airway obstructions. Results. In bench tests, our estimate of tracheal pressure was within −4.0±2.6% of the actual tracheal pressure (mean = standard deviation [SD]). In animal tests, our estimation of tracheal pressure was within −0.6±5%. In all bench test measurements and in 40 of 42 animal measurements, the error was less than 1 cm H2O.Conclusions. The cuff estimation technique gives real-time, continuous, noninvasive tracheal pressure measurements in intubated animals with cuffed ETTs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bolder PM, Healy TEJ, Bolder AR, et al. The extra work of breathing through adult endotracheal tubes. Anesth Analg 1986; 65: 853–859

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Banner MJ, Kirby RR, Blanch PB, Layon AJ. Decreasing imposed work of breathing to zero using pressure support ventilation. Crit Care Med 1993; 21: 1333–1338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Martin LD, Rafferty JF, Wetzel RC, Giola FR. Inspiratory work and response times of a modified pediatric volume ventilator during synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation and pressure support ventilation. Anesthesiology 1989; 71: 977–981

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Banner MJ, Blanch PB, Kirby RR. Imposed work of breathing and methods of triggering a demand-flow, continuous positive airway pressure system. Crit Care Med 1993; 21: 183–190

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Koska J, Kelley E, Banner MJ, Blanch P. Evaluation of a fiberoptic system for airway pressure monitoring. J Clin Monit 1994; 10: 247–250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Guttmann J, Eberhard L, Fabry B, et al. Continuous calculation of intratracheal pressure in tracheally intubated patients. Anesthesiology 1993; 79: 503–513

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilder, N.A., Orr, J. & Westenskow, D. Evaluation in animals of a system to estimate tracheal pressure from the endotracheal tube cuff. J Clin Monitor Comput 12, 11–16 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02025305

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02025305

Key words

Navigation