Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 191–199 | Cite as

Access and retrieval of information as coordinates of scientific development and achievement in Nigeria

  • I. Adamson
Article

Abstract

In the pioneering study on the quantitation of science in the first generation Nigerian Universities between 1975–79 using the scientific indicator of publication count of publishing scientists derived from ISI database, the data showed a real growth in scientific output. The growth correlated well with Federal Government funding of the Universities and the nation's Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The decline and often erratic funding stemmed the rate of growth in most of the Universities. In spite of the modest growth recorded for the fastest growing science of Biochemistry, where nutrition was identified as the major front of research, high infant morality rate (an index of under-development) was unabated. Retrieval of information to aid prosecution of relevant research and lack of access to scientific information have resulted in intellectual isolation of Nigerian scientists and inapplicability of research findings. Apart from India, the pathetic state of scientific growth and relevance in Nigeria is typical of the Developing Countries (DC). The situation calls for awareness of the importance of science indicators in strengthening the coverage of third world science and for support of science in the DC. Refining of science indicators for suitability to measuring science in these countries is also advocated.

Keywords

Develop Country Gross Domestic Product Nigeria World Science Relevant Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M.J. Moravcsik,Minerva, 2 (1964) 197–209.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M.J. Moravcsik,Minerva, 4 (1966) 381–90.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. de Solla Price,Proc. Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, 4 (1969) 98–111.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Inhaber,Research Policy, 3 (1974) 112–200.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Garfield, Preface in WIPIS, ISI, Phila, (1978) 7–11.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E.G. Kovach, WIPIS, ISI, Phila, (1978) 33–40.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    I. Adamson,Scientometrics, 3 (1981) 317–324.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    T.O. Odeinde, G.A. Alabi, In:What Science? The problems of Teaching and Research in Nigerian Universities,F.M.A. Ukoli (Ed.), 1985, pp. 131–149, Ibadan Univ. Press, Nigeria.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    F.M.A. Ukoli, In:What Science? The problems of Teaching and Research in Nigerian Universities,F.M.A. Ukoli (Ed.), 1985, pp. 64–87, Ibadan Univ. Press, Nigeria.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Gordon,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 30 (1979) 340–342.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P.N. Campbell,Biochemical Education, 5 (1977) 17.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    I. Adamson,Biochemical Education, 9 (1981) 144–146.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    E. Garfield,Current Contents, 33 (22) (1990) 5–13.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. King,Journal of the Information Science, 13 (1987) 261–276.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. Nichols, S. Majid,Canadian Library Journal, 46 (1989) 257–63.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M.J. Moravcsik,Scientometrics, 7 (1985) 165–76.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Adamson
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Natural Sciences University of AgricultureAbeokuta(Nigeria)

Personalised recommendations