Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 19, Issue 5–6, pp 481–493 | Cite as

Which reality do we measure?

  • P. Weingart
  • R. Sehringer
  • M. Winterhager
Article

Abstract

Scientific reality is a multi-sided phenomenon which cannot be described in a single and authoritative way. The descriptions of scientific research areas differ if one compares the definitions of science policy programmes with expert judgments in the peer-review process. Bibliometric measurements function as an intermediate representation of science. To make them useful and compatible with other representations they have to be translated. The difficulties of mutual translation of these different delineations of scientific research areas are demonstrated in two case studies (marine sciences and multiple sclerosis research) where each of these three different representations of science is supported by empirical results.

Keywords

Multiple Sclerosis Expert Judgment Citation Count Bibliometric Analysis Cluster Core 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Weingart
    • 1
  • R. Sehringer
    • 1
  • M. Winterhager
    • 1
  1. 1.Universität BielefeldUniversitätsschwerpunkt WissenschaftsforschungBielefeldFRG

Personalised recommendations