, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 143–153 | Cite as

Popular science publishing

  • S. Kyvik


The article gives an overview of the extent of popular science publishing and contributions to public debate, as compared to scientific publishing among faculty members at Norwegian universities. Faculty publish far fewer articles for the lay public than publications for their specialist colleagues. There are, however, clear field differences in this respect. The most productive researchers in terms of scientific publishing are also the most prolific in nonscientific publishing.


Faculty Member Science Publishing Public Debate Field Difference Popular Science 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. Whitley,Knowledge Producers and Knowledge Acquirers. Popularisation as a Relation Between Scientific Fields and Their Publics. In: T. Shinn and R. Whitley (Eds.):Expository Science: Forms and Functions of Popularisation. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, 1985.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    O. D. Lærum,Forskning til frokost, Cappelen, Oslo, 1991.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Recommendations concerning the international standardization of statistics on science and technology, UNESCO, Paris, 1978.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. J. Lotka, The frequency distribution of scientific productivity,Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16 (1926) 317.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. De Solla Price,Little Science, Big Science, Columbia University Press, New York, 1963.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. D. Allison,Processes of Stratification in Science, Arno Press, New York, 1980.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. G. Potter, Lotka's law revisited,Library Trends, 30, (1981) 21.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. Glänzel, A. Schubert, Price distribution. An exact formulation of Price's “square root law”,Scientometrics, 7 (1985) 211.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. L. Pao, Lotka's law: a testing procedure,Information Processing and Management, 21, (1985) 305.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Kyvik, Productivity differences, fields of learning, and Lotka's law,Scientometrics, 15 (1989) 205.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grunnforskningens vilkår i Norge, Norges offentlige utredninger, Oslo, 1981Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    N. C. Stenseth, Hawkins korte historie,Dagbladet, 4/10 (1992) 4.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. Ottosen,Forskningsformidling og journalistikk, Norsk journalisthøgskole, Oslo, 1988.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Kyvik,Productivity in Academia. Scientific Publishing at Norwegian Universities, Norwegian University Press, Oslo, 1991.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. Whitley,The Intellectuel and Social Organisation of the Sciences, Claredon Press, Oxford, 1984.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Kyvik
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Studies in Research and Higher EducationOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations