Abstract
Concentration of resources continues to be an important issue in the formulation of policy for the support of university research. In this paper, techniques for quantitatively assessing two dimensions of this issue, ‘between’ and ‘within’ committee concentrations, are developed. These techniques are applied in an analysis of the peer-adjudicated grants of the National Research Council of Canada for the years 1964–1974 inclusive. Results indicate that although ‘between’ committee concentrations have responded to changing priorities for university research, ‘within’ committee concentrations have remained remarkably stable over this decade. This is seen as having important implications for recent attempts at re-orienting university research in Canada.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
OECD,The Future of University Research, OECD, 1981.
Natural Sciences and Engineering Council (NSERC),Contact, February 1981.
C. FARINA, M. GIBBONS, A Quantitative Analysis of the Science Research Council's Policy of Selectivity and Concentration,Research Policy, 8 (1979), 306–338.
J. AITCHISON, J. A. C. BROWN,The Lognormal Distribution Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1963.
A. WEINBERG, Criteria for Scientific Choice,Minerva, I, (1963), 159–171.
E. SHILS,Criteria for Scientific Development: Public Policy and National Goals, MIT Press, London, 1968.
J. COLE and S. COLE,Peer Review in the National Science Foundation, Phase 1 of a Study, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D. C., 1978.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chapman, I.D., Farina, C. Concentration of resources: The National Research Council's (Canada) grants in aid of research: 1964–1974. Scientometrics 4, 105–117 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018449
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018449