Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of left ventricular function after sublingual administration of nifedipine in patients with moderate to severe hypertension

  • Nifedipine in Hypertension
  • Published:
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

To evaluate the left ventricular functional changes induced by acute decreases in blood pressure in 15 patients with systemic hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy, this study used Doppler and M-mode echocardiographic derived left ventricular indices. After 30 minutes of administration of sublingual nifedipine, both systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased and heart rates increased. The left ventricular end-systolic dimension decreased but not the end-diastolic dimension, which suggests that sublingual nifedipine may decrease only afterload, not preload. Total peripheral resistance decreased from 2770 to 1960 dyne · sec · cm−5. The M-mode-derived peak rate of dimension changes improved both the systolic and diastolic phase, and Dopplerderived indices of atrial contribution to ventricular filling decreased. Because both the systolic and diastolic phase indices of LV function are sensitive to variations in both preload and afterload, the improvement of myocardial contractility per se cannot necessarily be attributed to the direct effect of the drug to myocardium. Though favorable effect of myocardial oxygen supply-demand ratio or increased adrenergic tone stimulated by the decline in systemic arterial pressures may contribute to the augmentation of LV systolic and diastolic function observed after nifedipine in the present study, the apparent augmentation of LV function appears to be attributable primarily to afterload reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ludbrook PA, Tiefenbrum AJ, Reed FR, Sobel BE. Acute hemodynamic responses to sublingual nifedipine: Dependence on left ventricular function.Circulation 1982;65:489–497.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sahn DJ, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, Weyman A. The Committee on M-mode Standardization of the American Society of Echocardiography. Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: Results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements.Circulation 1978;58: 1072–1083.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Teichholz LE, Kreulen T, Herman M, Gorlin R. Problems in echocardiographic volume determinations: Echocardiographic-angiographic correlations in the presence or absence of asynergy.Am J Cardiol 1976;37:7–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Papademetriou V, Gottdiener JS, Fletcher RD, Freis ED. Echocardiographic assessment by computer-assisted analysis of diastolic left ventricular function and hypertrophy in borderline or mild systemic hypertension.Am J Cardiol 1985;37:7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Snider RA, Gidding SS, Rocchini AP, et al. Doppler evaluation of left ventricular diastolic filling in children with systemic hypertension.Am J Cardiol 1985;56:921–926.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Klein W, Brandt D, Vrecko K, Harringer M. Role of calcium antagonists in the treatment of essential hypertension.Circ Res 1983;52(Suppl 1):174–181.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Massie BM, Hirsch AT, Inouye IK, Tubau JF. Calcium channel blockers as antihypertensive agents.Am J Med 1984;77(Suppl 4A):135–142.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kurnik PB, Tiefenbrum AJ, Ludbrook PA. The dependence of the cardiac effects of nifedipine on the responses of the peripheral vascular system.Circulation 1984;69:963–972.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kurnik PB, Courtois MR, Ludbrook PA. Effects of nifedipine on intrinsic myocardial stiffness in man.Circulation 1986;74:126–134.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ishida Y, Meisner, J, Tsujioka K, et al. Left ventricular filing dynamics: Influence of left ventricular relaxation and left atrial pressure.Circulation 1986;74:187–196.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Iwase M, Sotobata I, Takagi S, et al. Effects of diltiazem on left ventricular diastolic behavior in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Evaluation with exercise pulsed Doppler echocardiography.J Am Coll Cardiol 1987;9:1099–1105.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Choong CY, Abascal VM, Thomas JD et al. Combined influence of ventricular loading and relaxation on the transmitral flow velocity profile in dogs measured by Doppler echocardiography.Circulation 1988;78:672–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Klein AL, Hatle LK, Burstow DJ, et al. Doppler characterization of left ventricular diastolic function in cardiac amyloidosis.J Am Coll Cardiol 1989;13:1017–1026.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stoddard MF, Pearson AC, Kern MJ, et al. Influence of alteration in preload on the pattern of left ventricular diastolic filling as assessed by Doppler echocardiography in humans.Circulation 1989;79:1226–1236.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lew WYW. Evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function.Circulation 1989;79:1393–1397.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hayashi, H., Iwase, M., Aoki, T. et al. Assessment of left ventricular function after sublingual administration of nifedipine in patients with moderate to severe hypertension. Cardiovasc Drug Ther 4 (Suppl 5), 969–975 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018302

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018302

Key words

Navigation