Skip to main content
Log in

The citation impact of letters to the editor; The case of Lancet

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Letters to the editor published in theLancet during the first half of 1980 were less cited than the corresponding papers. The average number of citations per letter was larger if the letter contained some substantive information. The longer the letter the more frequently it was cited. Letters that react to some previous publication tend to be shorter than “spontaneous” letters. “Reacting” letters tend to be less cited than spontaneous letters if they are short, more cited if they are longer. Letters with substantive information tend to originate outside the UK in which case they are also more cited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. Braun, W. Glänzel, A. Schubert, Assessing assessment of British science: some facts and figures to accept or decline,Scientometrics, 15 (1989) 165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. T. Braun, W. Glänzel, A. Schubert, Some data on the distribution of journal publication types in the Science Citation Index database,Scientometrics, 15 (1989) 325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. E. Garfield, Which medical journals have the greatest impact?Annals of Internal Medicine, 105 (1986) 313.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.S. Ghosh, Uncitedness of articles in Nature, a multidisciplinary scientific journal,Information Processing and Management, 11 (1975) 165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D. De Solla Price, Network of scientific papers,Science, 149 (1967) 510.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Testi, How international are medical journals?Lancet, (1982, December 25) 1473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. K. Kaneiwa, J. Adachi, M. Aoki, T. Masuda, N. Midorikawa, A. Tanimura, S. Yamazaki, A comparison between the journals Nature and Science,Scientometrics, 13 (1988) 125.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Siegel,Nonparametric statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, New York; McGraw Hill, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Van Elteren, On the combination of independent two sample tests of Wilcoxon,Bulletin de l'Institut International de Statistique, 37 (1960) 351.

    Google Scholar 

  10. B.R. Martin, J. Irvine, F. Narin, C. Sterritt, The continuing decline of British science,Nature, 330 (1987, November 12) 123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dedicated to the memory of Michael J. Moravcsik

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peritz, B.C. The citation impact of letters to the editor; The case of Lancet. Scientometrics 20, 121–129 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018150

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018150

Keywords

Navigation