Advertisement

Annals of Vascular Surgery

, Volume 8, Issue 6, pp 604–608 | Cite as

Lateral approach to femoral bifurcation

  • Marc Coggia
  • Olivier Goëau-Brissonnière
  • Jean- Pascal Leschi
  • Farzan Filsoufi
Selected Techniques
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

Femoral bifurcation can be approached through a lateral incision in the femoral triangle, passing behind the sartorius muscle and thus leaving undisturbed the femoral lymphatic network. The principal advantage of this route is it limits the local complications that occasionally result in infection of the operative site. This lateral approach is indicated primarily for infrainguinal revascularizations originating from the common femoral artery in patients at high risk for local infection. It should not, however, be used routinely because exposure of the vessels, particularly the medial aspect of the artery and the profundus vessels, is limited. The risks of this route are essentially related to the neural elements encountered during dissection.

Keywords

Public Health High Risk Femoral Artery Lateral Approach Medial Aspect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Patra P, Chaillou P, Noel SF, et al. Complications locales après abord du trépied fémoral en chirurgie aorto-fémorale. In Kieffer E, ed. Les Lésions Occlusives Aorto-iliaques Chroniques. Paris: Editions AERCV, 1991, pp 191–204.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Szilagyi S, Smith RF, Elliott JP, et al. Infection in arterial reconstruction with synthetic grafts. Ann Surg 1972;176:321–333.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goëau-Brissonnière O, Pechère JC, Leport C. Comment prévenir les infections de prothèse. In Kieffer E, ed. Les Anévrysmes de l'Aorte Abdominale Sous-rénale. Paris: Editions AERCV, 1990, pp 143–153.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Casey J, Flinn WR, Yao JST, et al. Correlation of immune and nutritional status with wound complications in patients undergoing vascular operations. Surgery 1983;93:822–827.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cruse PJE, Foord R. A five-year prospective study of 23,649 surgical wounds. Arch Surg 1973;107:206–210.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wengrovitz M, Atnip RG, Gifford RRM, et al. Wound complications of autogenous subcutaneous infrainguinal arterial bypass surgery: Predisposing factors and management. J Vasc Surg 1990;11:156–161.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    AbuRahma AF, Woodruff BA, Lucente FC. Edema after femoropopliteal bypass surgery: Lymphatic and venous theories of causation. J Vasc Surg 1990;11:461–467.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leather RP, Karmody AM. A lateral route for extra-anatomical bypass of the femoral artery. Surgery 1977;81:307–309.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Annals of Vascular Surgery Inc. 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc Coggia
    • 1
  • Olivier Goëau-Brissonnière
    • 1
  • Jean- Pascal Leschi
    • 1
  • Farzan Filsoufi
    • 1
  1. 1.Service de Chirurgie Viscérale et VasculaireHôpital Ambroise-ParéParisFrance

Personalised recommendations