Advertisement

Annals of Vascular Surgery

, Volume 8, Issue 6, pp 530–535 | Cite as

Proximal venous outflow obstruction in patients with upper extremity arteriovenous dialysis access

  • Enrique Criado
  • William A. Marston
  • Paul F. Jaques
  • Matthew A. Mauro
  • Blair A. Keagy
Original Articles

Abstract

To evaluate the impact of central venous obstruction on upper extremity hemodialysis access failure, we retrospectively analyzed our recent experience in managing this problem. We reviewed 158 upper extremity hemodialysis access procedures performed in 122 patients during a 1-year period. Fourteen (11.5%) patients had central vein obstruction as the cause of severe arm swelling, graft thrombosis, or graft malfunction. All 14 patients had had bilateral temporary subclavian vein dialysis catheters and failed upper extremity arteriovenous access. Seventeen lesions were treated in 14 patients including eight subclavian vein occlusions, six subclavian vein stenoses, two internal jugular vein stenoses, and one superior vena cava stenosis. Twenty-one procedures were performed including 17 percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasties (PTAs) with stent placement in 13, two axillary to innominate vein bypasses, and two axillary to internal jugular vein bypasses. All patients had resolution of symptoms. Thirteen (76%) PTAs were initially successful but in four (24%) cases it was impossible to recanalize the vein. Eight (47%) PTAs provided functional hemodialysis access for 2 to 9 months, two (12%) restenosed at 3 and 10 months and were successfully redilated, two occluded at 2 and 4 months and were unable to be recanalized, and one failed immediately after a successful PTA. Four PTA failures were followed by venous bypass, which remained patent and provided functional access 7 to 13 months after surgery. Of nine stenotic venous lesions six (67%) were successfully dilated without restenosis, whereas of eight occluded veins only two (25%) were successfully treated without recurrence. Temporary central hemodialysis catheters produce a significant number of symptomatic central vein obstructions in patients with upper extremity arteriovenous access. PTA with stenting and venous bypass provides early success in most patients. Transcatheter therapy is less successful in treating complete venous occlusions when compared with stenotic lesions. All effort should focus on preventing this complication by avoiding the use of temporary subclavian vein hemodialysis catheters.

Keywords

Internal Jugular Vein Subclavian Vein Venous Bypass Hemodialysis Access Hemodialysis Catheter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lazarus JM, Huang WH, Lew NL, et al. Contribution of vascular access-related disease to morbidity of hemodialysis patients. In Henry ML, Ferguson RM, eds. Vascular Access for Hemodialysis — III. Chicago: Precept Press, 1993, pp 3–13.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bassiouny HS, Krievins D, Glagov S, et al. Distal arteriovenous fistula inhibits experimental anastomotic intimal thickening. Surg Forum 1993;44:345–346.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vanherweghem J-L, Yassine T, Goldman M, et al. Subclavian vein thrombosis: A frequent complication of subclavian vein cannulation for hemodialysis. Clin Nephrol 1986;26:235–238.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barrett N, Spencer S, McIvor J, et al. Subclavian stenosis: A major complication of subclavian dialysis catheters. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1988;3:423–425.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schwab SJ, Quarles LD, Middleton JP, et al. Hemodialysis-associated subclavian vein stenosis. Kidney Int 1988;33:1156–1159.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davis D, Petersen J, Feldman R, et al. Subclavian venous stenosis: A complication of subclavian dialysis. JAMA 1984;252:3404–3406.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fant GF, Dennis VW, Quarles LD. Late vascular complications of the subclavian dialysis catheter. Am J Kidney Dis 1986;7:225–228.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Glaze RC, MacDougall ML, Wiegmann TB. Thrombotic arm edema as a complication of subclavian vein catheterization and arteriovenous fistula formation for hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 1986;7:439–441.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Glanz S, Gordon DH, Butt KMH, et al. The role of percutaneous angioplasty in the management of chronic hemodialysis fistulas. Ann Surg 1987;206:777–781.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beathard GA. Percutaneous transvenous angioplasty in the treatment of vascular access stenosis. Kidney Int 1992;42:1390–1397.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lund GB, Trerotola SO, Mitchell SE, et al. Central venous angioplasty: An exercise in futility in hemodialysis patients? Radiology 1993;189(P):198–199.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Currier CB, Widder S, Ali A, et al. Surgical management of subclavian and axillary vein thrombosis in patients with a functioning arteriovenous fistula. Surgery 1986;100:25–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sottiurai VS. Surgical management of brachio-axillary-subclavian vein thrombosis in hemodialysis patients. Presented at the Twenty-First World Congress of the International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery. Lisbon, Portugal: September 1993, pp 53–54.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brown L, McLaren JT. Subclavian to jugular bypass for relief of intractable venous hypertension and salvage of hemodi-alysis access [Abst]. J Vasc Surg 1993;18:537.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Annals of Vascular Surgery Inc. 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enrique Criado
    • 1
  • William A. Marston
    • 1
  • Paul F. Jaques
    • 2
  • Matthew A. Mauro
    • 2
  • Blair A. Keagy
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Vascular SurgeryUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of MedicineChapel Hill
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of MedicineChapel Hill

Personalised recommendations