Skip to main content
Log in

Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript


Cross-field comparison ofscientometric indicators 1 is severely hindered by the differences in publication and citation habits of science fields. However, relating publication and citation indicators to proper field-specific reference standards,relative indicators can be built, which may prove rather useful in the comparative assessment of scientists, groups, institutions or countries. The use ofrelational charts in displaying the indicators broadens the scope of such assessments. Relative indicators of chemistry research in 25 countries are presented as an illustrative example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. T. BRAUN, W. GLÄNZEL, A. SCHUBERT,Scientometric Indicators. A 32 Country Comparison of Publication Productivity and Citation Impact, World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. GARFIELD, Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool?Scientometrics, 1 (1979) 359.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. C. GRIFFITH, Science literature: How faulty a mirror of science?Aslib Proceedings, 31 (1979) 381.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. EDGE, Quantitative measures of communication in science: A critical review,History of Science, 27 (1979) 102.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. D. FRAME, Mainstream research in Latin America and the Caribbean,Interciencia, 2 (1977) 143.

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. BUJDOSÓ, T. BRAUN. Publication indicators of relative research efforts in physics subfields,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34 (1983) 150.

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. BRAUN, E. BUJDOSÓ, A. SCHUBERT, Research and Publication Trends in Analytical Chemistry to be published in 1986.

  8. A. SCHUBERT, W. GLÄNZEL, T. BRAUN, Relative citation rate: A new indicator for measuring the impact of publications, In: D. TOMOV, L. DIMITROVA (Eds),Proceedings of the First National Conference with International Participation on Scientometrics and Linguistics of Scientific Text, Varna, 1983, p. 80–81.

  9. E. GARFIELD, Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation,Science, 178 (1972) 471.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. GARFIELD, (Ed.),Science Citation Index, Journal Citation Reports. A Bibliometric Analysis of Science Journals in the ISI Database. Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia, annually from 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. SCHUBERT, W. GLÄNZEL, Statistical reliability of comparisons based on the citation impact of scientific publications,Scientometrics, 5 (1983) 59–74

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schubert, A., Braun, T. Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact. Scientometrics 9, 281–291 (1986).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: