, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 103–124

Citations and scientific progress: Comparing bibliometric measures with scientist judgments

  • A. L. Porter
  • D. E. Chubin
  • Xiao-Yin Jin

DOI: 10.1007/BF02017178

Cite this article as:
Porter, A.L., Chubin, D.E. & Jin, XY. Scientometrics (1988) 13: 103. doi:10.1007/BF02017178


This project compares various bibliometric measures and scientists' own judgments. Publication and cittion data are compiled for two cohorts of chemists awarded Sloan Fellowships. Citation patterns differ substantially between most cited papers and those these authors identify as their “best.” Theoretical, empirical, and methodological papers are contrasted as well. In addition, temporal citation patterns show that recognition spreads beyond the research area of a particular paper to yield “cross-disciplinary” citation surprisingly rapidly. Results suggest the utility of studying citation patterns among the Institute for Scientific Information Subject Categories, but also caution against equating publication and citation counts with scientific progress.

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. L. Porter
    • 1
  • D. E. Chubin
    • 2
  • Xiao-Yin Jin
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Industrial and Systems EngineeringGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlanta(USA)
  2. 2.Office of Technology AssessmentU. S. Congress(USA)
  3. 3.Shanghai Institute of CeramicsShanghai(China)

Personalised recommendations