Skip to main content
Log in

Academic personnel selection: Description and prognosis of the decisions made by the committee for the selection of candidates for a full professorship

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On the example of filling the vacancy of a full professorship for general psychology, the usefulness of the least-squares variant of Guttman's scalogram analysis (method of principal components for multicategory items) is demonstrated for giving assistance the process of personnel selection. Using some criteria being available per applicant such as adequacy of field of work, age, and number of publications this scaling procedure results in weights for each of the categories of the criteria indicating the relative importance of each criterion, and scores for all applicants pointing at their aptness. Since the recommendations deduced from the applicants' scores matched the decisions of the selection committee to a high degree, some aspects of the selection committee's decision process could be reconstructed as well as the predictive power of the method of principal components is exemplified. From the observation that this method worked well in case of 46 applicants and up to 7 criteria altogether having 18 categories, but did fail if applied to 9 candidates only, its suitability for moderate sample sizes can be infered which can be seen to be typical of the first screening steps within a multi-stage selection process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. Rasch, On general, laws and the meaning of measurement in psychology, Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Andrich, A rating formulation for ordered response categories,Psychometrika, 43 (1978) 561.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G.N. Masters, A Rasch model for partial credit scoring,Psychometrika, 47 (1982) 149.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E.B. Andersen, A general latent structure model for contingency table data, in:Principals of Modern Psychological Measurement,H. Wainer,S. Messick (Eds), Erlbaum, Hillsdale/New York, 1983, p. 117–138

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. Guttman, The quantification of a class of attributes: A theory and method of scale construction, inThe Prediction of Personal Adjustment,P. Horst et al. (Eds), Social Science Research Council, New York, 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. Guttman, The intensity component in attitude and opinion research, in:Studies in Social Psychology in World War II, Vol.IV: Measurement and Prediction,S.A. Stouffer et al. (Eds), Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1950, p. 213–276.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W.S. Torgerson,Theory and Methods of Scaling, Wiley, New York, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R.A. Fisher, The precision of discriminant functions,Annals of Eugenics, 10 (1940) 422.

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. Mosteller, A theory of scalogram analysis, using noncumulative types of items: a new approach to Thurstone's method of scaling attitudes,Report No. 9, Laboratory of Social Relations, Harvard University, Cambridge, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A.P. Horst, Measuring complex attitudes,Journal of Social Psychology, 6 (1935) 369.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A.P. Horst, Obtaining a composite measure from different measures of the same attribute,Psychometrika, 1 (1936) 53.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H.A. Edgerton, L.E. Kolbe, The method of minimum variation for the combination of criteria,Psychometrika, 1 (1936) 183.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S.S. Wilks, Weighting systems for linear functions of correlated variables when there is no dependent variable,Psychometrika, 3 (1938) 23.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J.P. Benzécri,L'Analyse des Données II: L'Analyse des Correspondences, Dunod, Paris, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M.J. Greenacre,Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis, Academic Press, New York, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Z. Gilula, S.J. Haberman, Canonical analysis of contingency tables by maximum likelihood,Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81 (1986) 780.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. de Leeuw, P.G.M. Van der Heijden, Reduced rank models for contingency tables,Biometrika, 78 (1991) 229.

    Google Scholar 

  18. P.F. Lazarsfeld, N.W. Henry,Latent Structure Analysis, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Gifi,Non-linear Multivariate Analysis, Department of Data Theory, Leiden, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  20. F.W. Young, Quantative analysis of qualitative data,Psychometrika, 46 (1981) 357.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J.L.A. Van Rijckevorsel, J. De Leeuw (Eds),Component and Correspondence Analysis, Wiley, New York, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Formann, A.K. Academic personnel selection: Description and prognosis of the decisions made by the committee for the selection of candidates for a full professorship. Scientometrics 25, 401–414 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016928

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016928

Keywords

Navigation