Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

International scientific cooperation: The continentalization of science

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By transforming science into a vast single market for the exchange of research products, the globalization of scientific activity effects the mechanisms by which countries enter into mutual relations. It is no longer sufficient to conduct research jointly; research must also, and perhaps above all, be conducted within the strategic space of the network. In practice, the network takes the form of a cluster of nations and emerges in response to various determining factors or constraints. This does not, however, result in arbitrary criteria of association with the network: the distance from one country or group of countries able to play a regional or continental “governance” role, cultural or linguistic affinities, geographic proximity, the recognition of common interests, the existence of political agreements on cooperation are all grounds for linkage or association. In short, the geography of exchanges is changing before our eyes. This study describes as “world-science” marked by the collectivization of the centre, “centrality” being defined not by a national monopoly, but by the “hard core” of a transnational network, stratified on a continental or subcontinental basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and notes

  1. D. C. Mowery, International Collaborative Ventures and the Commercialization of New Technologies,N. Rosenberg, R. Landau, D. C. Mowery (Eds),Technology and the Wealth of Nations, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 1992, p. 360.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Th. Schott, The World Scientific Community: Globality and Globalization.Minerva, XXIX (4) (Winter 1991) 440–462.

    Google Scholar 

  3. X. Polanco, Une science-monde: la mondialisation de la science européenne et la création de traditions scientifiques locales,Naissance et développement de la science-monde, Éditions la Découverte, Paris (1990) 10–52.

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Braudel,Afterthoughts on Material Civilization & Capitalism, Johns Hopkins, 1977.

  5. E. Schils, Center and Periphery,Center and Periphery, Essays in Macrosociology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1975, 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Moravcsik, Technical Assistance and Fundamental Research in Underdeveloped Countries,Minerva, 2 (2) (Winter 1964) 197–209.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Dedijer, Underdeveloped Science in Underdeveloped Countries,Minerva, 2 (1) (Autumn 1963) 61–81.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Th. Schott, World Science: Globalization of Institutions and Participation,Science, Technology & Human Values, 18 (2) (Spring 1992) 196–208.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. Schils, Reflections on Traditional Center and Periphery, and the Universal Validity of Science: The Significance of the Life of S. Ramanujan,Minerva, 29 (1991) 393–419.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Th. Schott, World Science: Globalization of Institutions and Participation,Science, Technology & Human Values, 18 (2) (Spring 1992) 196–208.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Th. Schott, The World Scientific Community: Globality and Globalization,Minerva, XXIX, (4) (Winter 1991) 440–462.

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. Polanyi,The Great Transformation, Beacon Press, Boston, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Carpenter,International Science Indicators — Development of Indicators of International Scientific Activity Using the Science Citation Index, report submitted to the National Science Foundation (Contract No. SRS 77-22770, Washington, D.C., 1979).

  14. National Science Board,Science & Engineering Indicators — 1991, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., U.S., NSB 91-1, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Schubert, W. Glänzel, T. Braun, Scientometrics Datafiles. A Comprehensive Set of Indicators on 2649 Journals of 96 Countries in All Major Science Fields and Subfields, 1981–1985,Scientometrics, 16 (1989) 3–478.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Anderson et al., On-Line Approaches to Measuring National Scientific Output: A Cautionary Tele,Science and Public Policy, 15 (3) (1988) 53–161;L. Leydesdorff, Problems with the ‘Measurement’ of National Scientific Performance,Science and Public Policy, 15 (3) (1988) 149–152;D. Lindsey, Production and Citation Measures in the Sociology of Science: The Problem of Multiple Authorship,Social Studies of Science, 10 (1980) 145–162.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Callon, J.-P. Courtial, H. Penan,La scientométrie Presses universitaires de France, Paris, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Callon, J.-P. Courtial, H. Penan,.

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. F. Moed, R. E. De Bruin, A. J. Nederhof, R. J. W. Tijssen, International Scientific Cooperation and Awareness within the European Community: Problems and Perspectives,Scientometrics, 21 (1991) 291–311.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See, for example,R. J. W. Tijssen, H. F. Moed, Literature-based Statistical Analyses of International Scientific Co-operation: An Exploratory Case Study of the Netherlands, in:Science and Technology Indicators: Their Use in Science Policy and Their Role in Science Studies,A. F. J. Van Raan and al. (Eds), Leiden, DSWO Press (1989) 129–145;T. Luukkonen, O. Persson, G. Sivertsen, Understanding Patterns of International Scientific Collaboration,Science, Technology & Human Values, 17 (1) (1992) 101–126.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See, for example,Y. Okubo, J.-F. Miquel, International Collaboration in Basic Science, in:Indikatoren der Wissenschaft und Technik- Theorie, Methoden, Anwendungen,P. Weingart and al. (Eds), Campus, Forschung (1991) 49–71;M. Leclerc, J.-F. Miquel, O. Okubo, L. Frigoletto, The Scientific Cooperation Between Canada and the European Community,Science and Public Policy, (19) 1, (1992) 15–24.

  22. T. Luukkonen, O. Persson, G. Sivertsen, Understanding Patterns of International Scientific Collaboration,Science, Technology & Human Values, 17 (1) (Winter 1992) 101–126;F. Narin, E. S. Whitlow,Measurement of Scientific Cooperation and Authorship in CEC-related Areas of Science, Vol. 1, Brussels, Commission of the European Communities (EUR 12900 EN, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. D. Frame, M. P. Carpenter, International Research Collaboration,Social Studies of Science, 9 (1979) 481–497;A. Schubert, T. Braun, International Collaboration in the Sciences, 1981–1985,Scientometrics, 19 (1–2) (1990) 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. Sigurdson, Internationalising Research and Development in Japan,Science and Public Policy, 19 (3) (1992) 134–144.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Th. Schott International Influence in Science: Beyond Center and Periphery,Social Science Research, 17 (1988) 219–238.

    Google Scholar 

  26. T. Luukkonen, O. Persson, G. Sivertsen, Understanding Patterns of International Scientific Collaboration,Science, Technology & Human Values, 17 (1) (Winter 1992) 101–126.

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. J. Moravcsik, The Coverage of Science in the Third World: The ‘Philadelphia Program’,L. Egghe, R. Rousseau (Eds),Informetrics, 87–88, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1988, 147–155.

    Google Scholar 

  28. UNESCO,Statistics on Science and Technology, Paris, October 1991.

  29. G. Gerefi,The Pharmaceutical Industry and Dependency in the Third World, Princeton University, Princeton, New Yersey, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  30. O. Kenichi,Triad Power: The Coming Shape of Global Competition, Free Press, New York, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  31. P. Kennedy,The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers, Random House, 1987.

  32. Ph. Mustar,Science et innovation: Annuaire raisonné de la création d'entreprises technologiques par les chercheurs en France, Paris, Economica, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  33. European Parliament,Les progrés de la construction en science — Aperçu documentaire sur les principales activités du Parlement européen (Direction générale des études, July 1986–June 1987).

  34. Ch. H. Davis, Th. O. Eisemon, Mainstream and Non Mainstream Scientific Literature in Four Peripheral Asian Scientific Communities,Scientometrics, 15 (1989) 215–239.

    Google Scholar 

  35. I. D. Duchacek, Multicommunal and Biocommunal Politics and Their International Relations,I. D. Duchacek, D. Latouche, G. Stevenson (Eds),Perforated Sovereignties and International Relations: Trans-Sovereign Governments, New York, Greenwood Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  36. D. J. de S. Price,Little Science, Big Science, Columbia University Press, 1963.

  37. Formal cooperation frameworks are increasingly appearing, binding countries that are, in some cases, on different continents. These frameworks are called «umbrella agreements»,M. D. Bloom,International Science and Technology Agreements: Their Use and Relevance, report prepared for the Royal Institute on Internaitonal Affairs, London, 1989, and apply to commercial accords as well as to multilateral research agreements between laboratories, to support for specific S & T research projects and so on.

  38. E. Crawford, Denationalizing Science: The Context of International Scientific Pratise,Sociology of Science Yearbook, (16), Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Th. Schott International Influence in Science: Beyond Center and Periphery,Social Science Research, 29 (1991) 393–419.

    Google Scholar 

  40. M. Callon, Vers des archipels de la science,Science et Technologie, 4 (1991) 66–69.

    Google Scholar 

  41. D. J. de S. Price,Little Science, Big Science, Columbia University Press, 1963.

  42. M. Callon, Vers des archipels de la science,Science et Technologie, 34 (1991) 66–69.

    Google Scholar 

  43. R. Reich, Who is Us?,Harvard Business Review, (March–April 1991) 77–88.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ministère de l'Industrie, du Commerce, de la Science et de la Technologie, 710, Place D'Youville, 3e étage, G1R 4YA, Québec, Québec, (Canada)

    M. Leclerc & J. Gagné

Authors
  1. M. Leclerc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Gagné
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leclerc, M., Gagné, J. International scientific cooperation: The continentalization of science. Scientometrics 31, 261–292 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016876

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016876

Keywords

Search

Navigation