, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 223–239 | Cite as

Model of manifested communication through publications

  • P. Vinkler


Communication is essential in scientific research. Scientific papers represent the main information sources in natural sciences. A model of theManifested Communication through Publications is introduced which makes it possible to calculate indicators characteristic of bilateral information processes.Bilateral Coupling is for example the total number of non-zero cross elements in the information matrix containing references to each other's papers of the two teams.


Information Process Natural Science Information Source Scientific Paper Information Matrix 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    W. D. Garvey,Communication: The Essence of Science, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1979.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. Schrum, N. Mullins, Network analysis in the study of science and technology, In:Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology,A. F. J. van Raan (Ed.), Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., 1988, p. 107.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Brieger, Career attributes and network structure: A blockmodel study of a biomedical research speciality,American Sociological Review, 41 (1976) 117.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. R. Blau, Sociometric structure of a scientific discipline,Research in Sociology of Knowledge, Sciences and Art, 1 (1978) 191.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. S. Burt,Toward a Structural Theory of Action, Academic Press, New York, 1982.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. R. Swanson, Two medical literatures that are logically but not bibliographically connected,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 38 (1987) 228.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Z. Chen, Let documents talk to each other: A computer model for connection of short documents,Journal of Documentation, 49 (1993) 44.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Doreian, A measure of standing of journals in stratified networks,Scientometrics, 8 (1985) 341.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. Ritchie, Communication networks: Tools for the efficient management of R & D,R & D Management, 7 (1977) 85.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Crawford, Informal communication among scientists in sleep research,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 22 (1971) 301.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. Garfield,Citation Indexing — Its Theory and Application in Science Technology, and Humanities, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1979.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Crane, Social structure in a group of scientists: A test of the “invisible college” hypothesis,American Sociological Review, 34 (1969) 335.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. Pinski, F. Narin, Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics,Information Processing and Management, 12 (1976) 297.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Vinkler, Bibliometric features of some scientific subfields and the scientometric consequences thereform,Scientometrics, 14 (1988) 453.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. Kretschmer, Pinski's citation based measures of research interactivity and the application of a complex structure measure to journal systems,Scientometrics, 18 (1990) 95.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    E. Noma, Using influence weights to evaluate the scientific importance of journals, In:Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology,A. F. J. van Raan (Ed.), Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., 1988, p. 677.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. P. Carpenter, F. Narin, Clustering of scientific journals,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24 (1973) 425.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. D. Robinson, Applied bibliometrics: Using citation analysis in the journal submission process,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42 (1991) 308.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. S. Campbell, Patent trends as a technological forecasting tool,World Patent Information, 3 (1983) 137.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. M. Kessler, Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers,American Documentation, 14 (1963) 10.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    H. Small, E. Sweeney, E. Greenlee, Clustering the science citation index using co-citations. II. Mapping science,Scientometrics, 8 (1985) 321.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    H. P. F. Peters, A. F. J. van Raan, Co-word-based science maps of chemical engineering. Part I: Representations by direct multidimensional scaling.Research Policy, 22 (1993) 23.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    H. P. F. Peters, A. F. J. van Raan, Co-word-based science maps of chemical engineering. Part II: Representations by combined clustering and multidimensional scaling,Research Policy, 22 (1993) 47.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    W. E. Snizek, K. Oehler, N. C. Mullins, Textual and non textual characteristics of scientific papers: Neglected science indicators,Scientometrics, 20 (1991) 25.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    H. P. F. Peters, A. F. J. van Raan, On determinants of citation scores: A case study in chemical engineering,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45 (1994) 39.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    J. D. Watson, F. H. C. Crick, Molecular structure of nucleic acid: A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid,Nature, 171 (1953) 737.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    F. I. Dretske,Knowledge & the Flow of Information, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1982.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    V. V. Nalimov, Z. M. Mulchenko,Naukometria, Nauka, Moscow, 1969.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    A. Schubert, T. Braun, Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact,Scientometrics, 9 (1986) 281.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    P. Vinkler, Bibliometric analysis of publication activity of a scientific research institute, In:Informetrics 89/90,L. Egghe, R. Rousseau (Eds), Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., 1990, p. 309.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    W. E. Holland, Characteristics of individuals with high information potential in government organizations,IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 19 (1972) 38.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Vinkler
    • 1
  1. 1.Central Research Institute for ChemistryHungarian Academy of ScienceBudapest(Hungary)

Personalised recommendations