Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 43–64 | Cite as

World science as an input-output system

  • H. Inhaber
  • M. Alvo
Article

Abstract

World science can be characterized as the product of one scientist or nation — knowledge or published papers — used or consumed by other scientists or nations. In this sense, science can be viewed as an input-output system, analogous to the models used in economics. An input-output model of the citation patters of the 18 leading countries in international science was constructed. These countries produce most of the world's science. The large role of the United States in both producing and consuming scientific information is evident in the results. The models also show the role of other countries with respect to each other. For example, the multinational nature of science in countries like the Netherlands and Switzerland is evident. The model can be used to show which countries interact with others, and which do not. Both types of information are useful in discussing trans-national interactions in science.

Keywords

United States Scientific Information Large Role World Science Citation Patter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    E.J. KNAPTON,France: An Interpretive History, Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, 1971, p. 253.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. B. AHMED, Input-Output Analysis in Environmental Monitoring,IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC3, 6 (1973) 537–8.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. CHEN, Input-Output Economic Analysis of Environmental Impact,ibid,, SMC 3, 6 (1973) 539–547.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    I. GUTMANIS, Environmental Implications of Economic Growth in the U.S. 1970 to 2000-Input-Output Analysis,ibid,, 6 (1973) 583.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. D. MAXIM, C. L. BRAZIE, Multistage Input-Output Model for Evaluation of Environmental Impact of Energy Systems,ibid, 6 (1973) 583–587.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. H. MIERNYK, Regional Input-Output Pollution Abatement Modell,ibid, 6 (1972) 575–577.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. PAGE, Pollution Affecting Producers in an Input-Output Context,Ibid, 6 (1973) 555–561.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. SHETER, Forecasting Industrial Pollution in Haifa Bay Area With an Innput-Output Model,Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 7 (1973) No. 5, 397–406.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. S. COHEN, A. P. HURTER, Input-Output Analysis of Costs of Air Pollution Control,Management Science, 21B (1974) No. 4, 453–461.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. GIARRATANI, Air Pollution Abatement-Output and Relative Price Effects — A Regional Input-Output Simulation,Environment and Planning, 6 (1974) No. 3, 307–312.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. CHATTERJEE, Dynamic Balanced Regional Input-Output Model of Pollution Control,ibid,, 7 (1975) 21–34.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    W. A. FLICK, Environmental Repercussions and Economic Structure — Input-Output Approach — Comment,Review of Economics and Statistics, 56 (1974) No. 1, 107–109.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    W. LEONTIEF, Environmental Repercussions and Economic Structure — Input-Output Approach — Reply,ibid,, 56 (1974) No. 1, 109–110.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    F. GIARRATANI, Air Pollution Abatement and Man-power Requirements — A Regional Input-Output Analysis,Annals of Regional Science, 9 (1975) No. 2, 83–90.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    W. H. MIERNYK, J. T. SEARS,Air Pollution Abatement and Regional Economic Development — Input-Output Analysis, Heath, Lexington, Mass., 1974.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. B. HOCKING, Chemical Input-Output Analysis of Municipal Solid-Waste Incineration,Journal of Environmental Systems, 5 (1975) No. 3, 163–183.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. J. DOUGLAS, Use of a Modified Input-Output Multiplier for Land Use Evaluation,Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 17 (1973) No. 1, 68–75.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. L. PARKER, Input-Output View of Agriculture in Papua-New Guinea,ibid, 18 (1974) No. 1. 32–39.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    D. MULKEY, J. C. HITE, Input Analysis of Energy Use by South Carolina Agriculture,American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56 (1974) No. 5, 1203.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    G. SCHLUTER, Combining Input-Output and Regression Analysis in Projection Models —Application to Agriculture,ibid, 56 (1974) No. 5, 1207.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    C. ESTRUP, Energy Consumption Analysis by Application of National Input-Output Tables,Industial Marketing Management, 3 (1974) No. 4, 193–200.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    J. B. PENN, B. McCARL, O. DOERING, L. BRINK, Structural Input-Output Modelling of Food and Fiber System Under Conditions of Fuel Scarcity,American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56 (1974) No. 5, 1203.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    M. A. SWIFT, Fuel Substitution in Input-Output Models — Non-linear Programming Approach,Operations Research, 23 (S2) B427 (1975).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    M. O. FILANI, Air Traffic Forecasting — Input-Output Technique Approach,Regional Studies, 7 (1973) No. 3, 333–338.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    S. L. GRAY, J. R. McKEEAN, D. D. ROHDY, Estimating Impact of Higher Education from Input-Output Models — Case Study,Rocky Mountain Social Science Journal, 12 (1975) No. 1. 1–10.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    B. C. LIU, Regional Hospital Needs Projection — Input-Output Approach,Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 10 (1976) No. 1, 37–42.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. A. KONIUS, Commensuration of Labor by Means of an Input-Output Table,Matekon, 9 (1973) No. 4, 31–42.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    P. C. NYSTROM, Input-Output Processes of Federal Trade Commission,Administrative Science Quarterly, 20 (1975) No. 1, 104–113.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    C. P. BOURNE, The World's Technical Journal Literature: An Estimate of Volume, Origin, Language, Field, Indexing and Abstracting,American Documentation, (1962) 159–168.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    F. NARIN,Evaluative Bibliometrics, Computer Horizons Inc., Cherry Hill, N. J., 1976.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Published by the Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia, Pa.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    H. CASON, M. LUBOTSKY, The Influence and Dependence of Psychological Journals on Each Other,Psychological Bulletin, 33 (1936) 95–103.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    A. K. GUPTA, Characteristics of Documents cited by Indian Physicists: A Case Study,DRTC Seminar (India), No. 7, Paper JB, 1969.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    F. NARIN, M. P. CARPENTER, National Publication and Citation Comparisons,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 26 (1975) 80–93.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    L. V. XHIGNESSE, C. E. OSGOOD, Bibliographic Citation Characteristics of the Psychological Journal Network in 1950 and in 1960,American Psychologist, 22 (1967) 778–791.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    R. S. DANIEL, C. M. LOUTTIT,Professional Problems in Psychology, Prentice-Hall, New York, 1953.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    J. B. KRUSKAL, Multidimensional Scaling by Optimizing Goodness of Fit to a Non-metric Hypothesis,Psychometrika, 29 (1964) No. 1, 1–27.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    J. B. KRUSKAL, Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling: A Numerical Method,Psychometrika, 29 (1964) No. 2, 115–129.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    H. INHABER, Where Scientists Publish,Social Studies of Science, 7 (1977) No. 3, 388–394.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Personal communication, F. NARIN, President, Computer Horizons Inc., Cherry Hill, N. J., Nov. 12, 1975.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    H. INHABER, The Leading Edge of Science in Canada,Research Policy, 7 (1977) 88–98.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    G. PINSKI, Influence and Interrelationship of Chemical Journals,Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 17 (1977) 67–74.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    J. D. FRAME, F. NARIN, M. P. CARPENTER, The Distribution of World Science,Social Studies of Science, 7 (1977) No. 4, 501–516.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Inhaber
    • 1
  • M. Alvo
    • 1
  1. 1.Planning and Finance ServiceEnvironment CanadaOttawa(Canada)

Personalised recommendations