, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 213–230 | Cite as

Research contribution, authorship and team cooperativeness

  • P. Vinkler
Invited Papers


Activity shares in different types of research work for coauthors of scientific papers were detected by questionnaire methods. It was found e.g. that first authors perform about 70% of the total work needed for two authored papers, which decreases to 34% for papers with five authors. From Total Activity Shares determined for coauthors Total Team Contribution Factors could be calculated for cooperating teams. Total as well as Intramural and Extramural Team Cooperativeness for research teams were obtained by relating shares of impact factor scores for the investigated teams to the total.


Research Team Research Work Impact Factor Factor Score Total Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    D.J. de Solla Price,Little Science, Big Science, Columbia University Press, New York, 1963.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W.D. Garvey,Communication: The Essence of Science, Pergamon Press, Oxford, etc. 1979.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Folly, B. Hajtmann, J.I. Nagy, I. Ruff, Some methodological problems in ranking scientists by citation analysis,Scientometrics, 3 (1981) 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Schubert, W. Glänzel, T. Braun, World Flash on Basic Research. Scientometrics datafiles. A comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries in all major science fields and subfields 1981–1985,Scientometrics, 16 (1989) 3.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H.A. Zuckerman, Nobel laureates in science: Patterns of productivity, collaboration, and authorship,American Sociological Review, 32 (1967) 391.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H.A. Zuckerman, Patterns of name ordering among authors of scientific papers: A study of social symbolism and its ambiguity,The American Journal of Sociology, 74 (1968) 276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Cole, J.R. Cole, Visibility and the structural bases of awareness of scientific research,American Sociological Review, 33 (1968) 397.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. Crane,Invisible Colleges, Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, London, 1972.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. de B. Beaver, R. Rosen, Studies in scientific collaboration, Part II. Scientific co-authorship, research productivity and visibility in the French scientific elite, 1799–1830,Scientometrics, 1 (1979) 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. Kretschmer, R. Müller, A contribution to the dispute on the Ortega hypothesis: Connection between publication rate and stratification of scientists, tested by various methods,Scientometrics, 18 (1990) 43.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J.D. Frame, M.P. Carpenter, International research collaboration,Social Studies of Science, 9 (1979) 481.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Schubert, T. Braun, International collaboration in the sciences, 1981–1985,Scientometrics, 19 (1990) 3.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. Vinkler, Bibliometric analysis of publication activity of a scientific research institute, In:Informetrics, 89/90,L. Egghe, R. Rousseau (Eds), Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1990, p. 309.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    E. Garfield,Science Citation Index, Journal Citation Reports, A Bibliometric Analysis of Science Journals in the ISI Data Base, Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia, 1983.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. Vinkler, An attempt of surveying and classifying bibliometric indicators for scientometric purposes,Scientometrics, 13 (1988) 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    L.L. Havlicek, R.D. Crain,Practical Statistics for the Physical Sciences, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1988.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    B.R. Martin, J. Irvine, Assessing basic research,Research Policy, 12 (1983) 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    I. Ajiferuke, Q. Burrel, J. Tague, Collaborative coefficient: A single measure of the degree of collaboration in research,Scientometrics, 14 (1988) 421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    K. Subramanyam, Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: A review,Journal of Information Science, 6 (1983) 33.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    S.M. Lavani, Quality, Collaboration and Citations in Cancer Research: A Bibliometric Study, Ph. D. Dissertation, Florida State University, 1980.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    R.P. Croll, The noncontributing author: An issue of credit and responsibility,Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 27 (1984) 401.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    P. Vinkler, Publication strategy of research teams and the authorship threshold (under preparation).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Vinkler
    • 1
  1. 1.Central Research Institute for Chemistry of the Hungarian Academy of SciencesBudapest(Hungary)

Personalised recommendations