Toward a definition of “bibliometrics”

Abstract

The definitions of the term ‘bibliometrics’ as used in the literature are examined and evaluated. Most such definitions are held to be too broad. A new definition is proposed; then its advantages and possible defects pointed out. A crucial question is whether Zipf's law of word occurrence should be considered a part of this particular sub-discipline.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    The word does not appear in: R. W. BURCHFIELD (Ed.),A Supplement to the Oxford English Dictionary, Oxford, At the Clarendon Press, Vol. I, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    R. A. FAIRTHORNE, Empirical hyperbolic distributions (Bradford-Zipf-Mandelbrot) for bibliometric description and prediction,Journal of Documentation, 25 (1969) 319.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    A. PRITCHARD, Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics?,Journal of Documentation, 25 (1969) 348.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    E. W. HULME,Statistical Bibliography in Relation to the Growth of Modern Civilization, London, Printed for the Author by Butler & Tanner; Grafton & Company, 1923.

  5. 5.

    A. THACKRAY, Measurement in the Historiography of Science, in: Y. ELKANA, J. LEDERBERG, R. MERTON, A. THACKRAY, H. ZUCKERMAN (Eds),Toward a Metric of Science: The Advent of Science Indicators, New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1978, p. 11–30.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    G. R. WITTIG, Statistical bibliography-a historical footnote,Journal of Documentation, 34 (1978) 240.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    PRITCHARD, 1969 (op. cit., note 3) 349.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    B. C. PERITZ, On the careers of terminologies; the case of bibliometrics,Libri, 34 (1984) 233.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    U. S. LIBRARY oF CONGRESS, SUBJECT CATALOGING DIVISION, Library of Congress Subject Headings, 9th ed., Washington, Library of Congress, 1980, Vol. 1, p. 238.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    FAIRTHORNE, 1969 (op. cit., note 2) 319.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    A. SCHRADER, Teaching bibliometrics,Library Trends, 30 (1981) 151.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    B. R. BOYCE, D. H. KRAFT, Principles and theories in information science, in: M. E. WILLIAMS (Ed.),Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 20, White Plains, N. Y., Knowledge Industry Publications, Inc., 1985, p. 163.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    F. DE GLAS, Fiction and bibliometrics: Analyzing a publishing house's stocklist,Libri, 36 (1986) 40.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    W. G. POTTER, Introduction,Library Trends, 30 (1981) 5.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    A. PRITCHARD, in collaboration with G. R. WITTIG,Bibliometrics, A Bibliography and Index, Vol. 1, Watford, Hertz., U. K., ALLM Books, 1981, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    F. MACHLUP, U. MANSFIELD, Cultural diversity in studies of information, in: MACHLUP, MANSFIELD (Eds),The Study of Information, Interdisciplinary Messages, New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    J. H. SHERA, Librarianship and information science, in: MACHLUP, MANSFIELD (Eds), 1983 (op cit., note 16) p. 381.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    P. WILSON, Bibliographical R&D, in: MACHLUP, MANSFIELD (Eds), 1983 (op cit., note 16), p. 392.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    F. NARIN,Evaluative Bibliometrics: The Use of Publication and Citation Analysis in the Evaluation of Scientific Activity, Cherry Hill, N. J., Computer Horizons, Inc., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    W. G. POTTER, 1981 (op cit., note 14) 6.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    H. YOUNG (Ed.),The ALA Glossary of Library and Information Science, Chicago, American Library Association, 1983, p. 22 (Italics in original.)

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    E. GARFIELD, M. V. MALIN, H. SMALL, Citation Data as Science Indicators, in: Y. ELKANA et al. (Eds), 1978 (op cit., note 5), p. 180.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    D. NICHOLAS, M. RITCHIE,Literature and Bibliometrics, London, Clive Bingley, 1978, p. 9, 31.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    R. PRYTHERCH (Ed.),Harrod's Librarians' Glassary, 5th ed., Aldershot, Hants., U. K., Gower, 1984, p. 74.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    D. T. HAWKINS, Unconventional Uses of on-line information retrieval systems: On-line bibliometric studies,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 28 (1977) 13.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    J. C. DONOHUE, A bibliometric analysis of certain information science literature,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 23 (1972) 313.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    I. K. RAVICHANDRA RAO, Informetrics vis-a-vis bibliometrics,Newsletter of the International Federation for Documentation, Committee for Informatrics, No.1 (1985) 4.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    B. K. FERRANTE, Bibliometrics: Access in the library literature,Collection Management, 2 (1978) 199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    BOLT BERANEK AND NEWMAN, INC,Toward the Library of the 21 st Century, Cambridge, Mass., The Firm, 1964, p. 6 43.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    For examples: A. BOOKSTEIN, The bibliometric distributions,Library Quarterly, 46 (1976) 416; A BOOKSTEIN, Explanations of the bibliometric laws,Collection Management, 3 (1979) 151; R. E. WYLLYS, Empirical and theoretical bases of Zipf's law,Library Trends, 30 (1981) 53.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    A. F. BROWN (Comp.),Normal and Reverse English Word List, Prepared at the University of Pennsylvania under a contract with the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, 1963, Vol. 1, p. v.

  32. 32.

    J. W. BLACK, C. S. STRATTON, A. C. NICHOLS, M. A. CHAVEZ,The Use of Words in Context: the Vocabulary of College Students, New York, Plenum Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    T. N. RAJAN, Informatics: The concept and its ramifications,Newsletter of the International Federation for Documentation, Committee for Informetrics, No. 1 (1985) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    D. DE SOLLA PRICE, The parallel structures of science and technology, in: B. BARNES, D. EDGE (Eds)Science in Context, Readings in the Sociology of Science, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1982, p. 167.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    J. VLACHY, Scientometric analysis in physics. A bibliography of publication, citation, and mobility studies,Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, Section B, 35 (1985) 2.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    J. VLACHY, Scientific analysis in physics-Where we stand,Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, Section B, 36 (1986) 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Broadus, R.N. Toward a definition of “bibliometrics”. Scientometrics 12, 373–379 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016680

Download citation

Keywords

  • Crucial Question
  • Word Occurrence