References
D. EDGE, Quantitative measures of communication in science: A critical review,History of Science, 17 (1979) 102.
M. J. MORAVSCIK, P. MURUGESAN, Some results on the function and quality of citations,Social Studies of Science, 5 (1975) 86.
M. H. MACROBERTS, B. R. MACROBERTS, Quantitative measures of communication in science: A study of the formal level,Social Studies of Science, 16 (1986) 151.
J. COLE, S. COLE, The Ortega Hypothesis,Science, 178 (1972) 368.
J. A. VIRGO, A statistical procedure for evaluating the importance of scientific papers,The Library Quarterly, 47 (1977) 415.
E. GRFIELD,Citation Indexing, New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1979 Chapters 1 and 2.
G. N. GILBERT, Referencing as persuation,Social Studies of Science, 7 (1977) 113.
H. SMALL, Cited documents as concept symbols,Social Studies of Science, 8 (1978) 327.
D. NORRIS, Word recognition: Context effects without priming,Cognition, 22 (1986) 93.
L. HASHER, R. T. ZACKS, Automatic processing of fundamental information: The case of frequency of occkurrence,American Psychologist, 39 (1984) 1372.
H. SMALL, The synthesis of specialty narrtives from co-citation clusters,Journal of the American Society for Information Science 37 (1986) 97.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
A comment on “Testing the Ortega Hypothesis: Facts and Artificats” by M. H. MACROBERTS and B. R. MACROBERTS,Scientometrics, 12 (1987) 293.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Small, H. The significance of bibliographic references. Scientometrics 12, 339–341 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016676
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016676