Skip to main content

Citation theory and the Ortega hypothesis

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. M. H. MACROBERTS, B. R. MACROBERTS, Quantitative measures of communication in science: A study of the formal level,Social Studies of Science, 16 (1986) 151.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. J. NEDERHOF, A. F. J. van RAAN, Peer review and bibliometric indicators of scientific performance: A comparison of cum laude doctorates with ordinary doctorates in physics,Scientometrics, 11 (1987) 329.

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. F. MOED, W. J. M. BURGER, J. G. FRANKFORT, A. F. J. Van RAAN,On the Measurement of Research Performance: The Use of Bibliometric Indicators, University of Leiden, Leiden, 1983, Monograph: 200 pp. ISBN 90-9000552-8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. F. MOED, W. J. M. BURGER, J. G., FRANKFORT, A. F. J. van RAAN, The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research reformance,Research Policy, 14 (1985) 131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S. COLE, The hierarchy of the sciences,American Journal of Sociology, 89 (1983) 111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

A comment on “Testing the Ortega Hypothesis: Facts and Artifacts” by M. H. MACROBERTS and B. R. MACROBERTS,Scientometrics, 12 (1987) 293

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nederhof, A.J., Van Raan, A.F.J. Citation theory and the Ortega hypothesis. Scientometrics 12, 325–328 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016674

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016674

Keywords

  • Citation Theory
  • Ortega Hypothesis