Skip to main content
Log in

A matrix analysis of scientific special ties and careers in science

Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article


A preliminary theoretical study is given of scientometric parameters such as co-authorship, co-references, co-citation, etc. The concept is based on a “scientific space” whose elements are the scientific articles and their authors. The matrix operations representing certain hypotheses as well as sound definitions of concepts used so far in scientometrics are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. N. R. HANSON,Patterns of Discovery, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1969, p. 78.

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. RUSSELL, Mathematics and the metaphysicians.The International Monthly, 1901. Reprinted in:Mysticism and Logic. Various editions.

  3. D. de SOLLA PRICE, The networks of scientific papers,Science, 145 (1965) 510–515.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. O. MAY, Quantitative growth of the mathematical literature.Science, 154 (1966) No. 3757, 1672–1673.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. MACRAE, Growth and decay curves in scientific citations,The American Sociological Review, 34 (1969) No. 5 361–365.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. S. FISHER, The death of a methematical theory.Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 8 (1966) No. 2, 127–159.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. J. LOTKA, The frequency distribution of scientific productivity.Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16 (June 1962) 317–323.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. G. SMALL, A bibliography of citation studies, 1975. Philadelphia, Institute for Scientific Information (Unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. R. COLE, S. COLE,Social Stratification in Science, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. M. KESSLER, An experimental study of bibliographic coupling between technical papers.IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, (Jan. 1963) 49–51.

  11. B. C. GRIFFITH, H. G. SMALL, J. A. STONEHILL, S. DEY, The structure of scientific literatures: toward a macro-and micro structure for science.Science Studies, 4 (1974) 339–365.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. G. SMALL, B. C. GRIFFITH, The structures of scientific literatures. 1. Identifying and graphing specialties.Science Studies, 4 (1974) 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. COOMBS,The Theory of Data, New York, Wiley, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  14. T. K. KRAUZE, Social and intellecrual structural of science: a mathematical analysis,Science Studies, 2 (1972) 369–378.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. M. WEINBERG,Reflections on Big Science. Cambridge, Mass., The MIT Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. GOLDSMITH, A. MACKAY, (Eds) The science of science. In:Society and Science, New York, Simon and Schuster, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krauze, T.K., McGinnis, R. A matrix analysis of scientific special ties and careers in science. Scientometrics 1, 419–444 (1979).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: