Skip to main content
Log in

Densitometric measurement of renal echogenicity in infants and naked eye evaluation: A comparison

  • Originals
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The sonograms of 115 infants with normal renal function ranging in age from 1 to 120 days used to determine renal parenchymal echogenicity by densitometry. The measured values were contrasted with the evaluations of 4 independent examiners who rated renal echogenicity as “less than”, “equal to” or “greater than” that of the liver. The results revealed that naked eye evaluation does not permit a clear distincition between the categories of echogenicity and also that the assessments of the individual examiners differed considerably. Contrary to the previously held view the present findings indicate that the initially increased renal parenchymal echogenicity in neonates has developed into the normal hypoechoic condition after 1 month. One should take these findings into account when evaluating renal sonograms of infants, especially if no densitometric data are available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Winkler P, Altrogge H (1985) Sonographic signs of nephritis in children. Pediatr Radiol 15: 213

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rosenfield AT, Siegel NJ (1980) Renal parenchymal disease: Histopathologic-sonographic-correlation. AJR 137: 793

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vergesslich KA, Mileder P, Ponhold W (1988) Die Änderung der renalen Echogenität bei kindlichen obstruktiven Uropathien. Ultraschall 9: 163

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cramer BC, Jequier S, de Chadarevian IP (1986) Factors associated with renal parenchymal echogenicity in newborn. J Ultrasound Med 5: 633

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ponhold W, Vergesslich KA (1986) Das Verhalten der renalen parenchymatösen Echogenität bei kindlichen nephro-urologischen Erkrankungen. Nieren Hochdruck 15: 540

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boal F, Teele RL (1980) Sonography of infantile polycystic kidney disease. AJR 135: 575

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Erwin BC, Carroll BA, Muller H (1985) A sonographic assessment of neonatal renal parameters. J Ultrasound Med 4: 217

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hricak H, Cruz C, Romanski R, Uniewski MH, Levin NW, Madrazo B, Sandler MA, Egler W (1982) Renal parenchymal disease: sonographic histologic correlation. Radiology 144: 141

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Han BK, Babcock DS (1985) Sonographic measurements and appearance of normal kidneys in children. AJR 145: 611

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lamont AC, Graebe AC, Pelmore JM, Thompson JR (1989) Ultrasound assessment of renal cortical brightness in infants, is naked eye evaluation reliable? 26th Congress of the European Soc Paediatr Radiol: P 12

  11. Platt JF, Rabin JM, Bowerman RA, Marn CS (1987) The inability to detect kidney disease on the basis of echogenicity. AJR 151: 317

    Google Scholar 

  12. Haller JO, Berdon WE, Friedman AP (1982) Increased renal cortical echogenicity: a normal finding in neonates and infants. Radiology 142: 173

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eggert, P., Debus, F., Kreller-Laugwitz, G. et al. Densitometric measurement of renal echogenicity in infants and naked eye evaluation: A comparison. Pediatr Radiol 21, 111–113 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02015619

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02015619

Keywords

Navigation