Skip to main content
Log in

Pneumatic reduction of intussusception using carbon dioxide

  • Originals
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pneumatic reduction using air has recently become popular for the initial non-surgical managment of intussusception. Since carbon dioxide (CO2) is rapidly absorbed from body surfaces, it should theoretically result in less cramping and distension following reduction. We reviewed our recent experience with the pneumatic reduction of intussusception using CO2 in 26 children. In 22 of these the intussusception was reduced (85%). There was one perforation with CO2; the patient did not suffer any postoperative complications. Five additional children who had been treated unsuccessfully with barium had intussusception subsequently reduced with CO2. Following CO2 reduction, most children were fed within hours, and there were no instances of significant abdominal distension or cramping. We conclude that pneumatic reduction of intussusception using CO2 is safe and effective, and has the theoretical advantage of more rapid absorption from the gastrointestinal tract than air.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schmitz-Rode T, Muller-Liesse C, Alzen G (1991) Comparative examination of various rectal tubes and contrast media for the reduction of intussusceptions. Pediatr Radiol 21:341–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shiels WE, Maves CK, Hedlund GL, Kirks DR (1991) Air enema for diagnosis and reduction of intussusception: clinical experience and pressure correlates. Radiology 181:169–172

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sargent MA, Wilson BPM (1991) Are hydrostatic and pneumatic methods of intussusception reduction comparable? Pediatr Radiol 21:346–349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stringer DA, Ein SH (1990) Pneumatic reduction: advantages, risks and indications. Pediatr Radiol 20:475–477

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Palder SB, Eion SH, Stringer DA, Alton D (1991) Intussusception: barium or air? J Pediatr Surg 26:271–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bernier P, Coblentz C (1986) CO2 delivery system for double-contrast barium enema examinations. Radiology 159:264

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hedlund GL, Johnson JF, STrife JL (1990) Ileocolic intussusception: extensive reflux of air preceding pneumatic reduction. Radiology 174:187–189

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Todani T, Sato Y, Watanabe Y, et al (1990) Air reduction for intussusception in infancy and childhood: ultrasonographic diagnosis and management without X-ray exposure. Z Kinderchir 45:222–226

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gu L, Alton D, Daneman A, et al (1988) Intussusception reduction by rectal insufflation of air. AJR 150:1345–1348

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Guo J, Ma X, Shou Q (1986) Results of air pressure enema reduction of intussusception: 6396 cases in 13 years. J Pediatr Surg 21:1201–1203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jinzhe Z, Yenxia W, Linchi W (1986) Rectal inflation reduction of intussusception in infants. J Pediatr Surg 21:30–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gierup J, Jorulf H, Livaditis A (1972) Management of intussusception in infants and children: a survey based on 288 consecutive cases. Pediatrics 50:535–541

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ching E, Ching LT, Lynn HB, et al (1990) Intussusception in children. Mayo Clin Proc 45:724–728

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paterson, C.A., Langer, J.C., Somers, S. et al. Pneumatic reduction of intussusception using carbon dioxide. Pediatr Radiol 24, 296–297 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02015463

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02015463

Keywords

Navigation