Microbial Ecology

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 95–103 | Cite as

Filamentous microbes indigenous to the murine small bowel: A scanning electron microscopic study of their morphology and attachment to the epithelium

  • Ruth V. Blumershine
  • Dwayne C. Savage
Article

Abstract

Segmented, filamentous prokaryotic microorganisms colonize and attach to the cells in the epithelium of the mucosa of the small bowels of mice and rats. Scanning electron micrographs, derived from specimens of mouse small intestine, reveal microbial filaments of at least two types. One type is thin (0.8μm) with only faint lines suggesting septa; the other is thicker (1.4μm) and has distinct segments with pronounced septa. Most of the segments are rounded; a few are thin and elongated. Immediately surrounding the attachment site of these organisms, the surface of the epithelial cells appears roughened and occasionally stringy. The filaments may differ morphologically because they represent different phases in the life cycle of a single microbial type. Alternatively, however, they may differ because they are the cells of different microbial types colonizing the same epithelial habitat.

Keywords

Epithelial Cell Life Cycle Small Intestine Small Bowel Microbe 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Chase, D.G., and S. L. Erlandsen: Evidence for a complex life cycle and endospore formation in the attached, filamentous, segmented bacterium from murine ileum. J. Bacteriol.127, 572–583 (1976)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davis, C. P., and D. C. Savage: Habitat, succession, attachment, and morphology of segmented, filamentous microbes indigenous to the murine gastrointestinal tract. Infect. Immunol.10, 948–956 (1974)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davis, C. P., and D. C. Savage: Effect of penicillin on the succession, attachment, and morphology of segmented, filamentous microbes in the murine small bowel. Infect. Immunol.13, 180–188 (1976)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Erlandsen, S. L., and D. G. Chase: Morphological alterations in the microvillus border of villus epithelial cells produced by intestinal microorganisms. J. Clin. Nutr.27, 1277–1286 (1974)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fuller, R., and A. Turvey: Bacteria associated with the intestinal wall of the fowl. J. Appl. Bacteriol.34, 617–622 (1971)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hampton, J. C., and B. Rosario: The attachment of microorganisms to epithelial cells in the distal ileum of the mouse. Lab. Invest.14, 1464–1481 (1965)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Malick, L. E., and R. B. Wilson: Evaluation of a modified technique for SEM examination of vertebrate specimens without evaporated metal layers. IIT Res. Inst., Scanning Electron Microscopy,1975, 259–266 (1975)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Savage, D. C.: Localization of certain indigenous microorganisms on the ileal villi of rats. J. Bacteriol.97, 1505–1506 (1969)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Savage, D. C.: Associations and physiological interactions of indigenous microorganisms and gastrointestinal epithelia. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.25, 1372–1379 (1972)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Savage, D. C. and R. Blumershine: Surface-surface associations in microbial communities populating epithelial habitats in the murine gastrointestinal ecosystem: Scanning electron microscopy. Infect. Immunol.10, 240–250 (1974)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruth V. Blumershine
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dwayne C. Savage
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Southern Illinois University School of MedicineSpringfield
  2. 2.Department of Microbiology and School of Basic Medical SciencesUniversity of IllinoisUrbana

Personalised recommendations