Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multivariate analysis of antibiograms for typingPseudomonas aeruginosa

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A method for typing Pseudomonas aeruginosa using antibiotic susceptibility patterns is presented, which allows recognition of clusters of the same strain among clinical isolates from different patients, thus indicating whether cross infection has occurred. An index of similarity (the euclidean or the oblique distance), which includes all the differences of disk zone sizes among isolates, is computed and then elaborated by a clustering algorithm that successively groups all the isolates in larger clusters. The results of clustering are presented as dendrograms, whose terminal branches are pruned down to a level below which differences are casual; isolates that still appear on a common branch are considered identical. The reliability of this technique for detecting nosocomial cross infections was assessed by comparing its results with that of serotyping and pyocin typing. Only 2 of 31 (6.4%) clusters detected by multivariate analysis were not confirmed, while 4 of 33 (12.1%) clusters were recognized by serotyping and pyocin typing, but not by multivariate analysis. In at least two instances the differences in susceptibility patterns were due to cytoplasmic R factors. The routine use of antibiogram data for typing purposes should be considered an essential part of nosocomial infection control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cross, A. S.: Evolving epidemiology ofPseudomonas aeruginosa infections. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1985, 44: 156–159.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schimpf, S. C., Moody, M., Young, V. M.: Relationship of colonization withPseudomonas aeruginosa to development ofPseudomonas bacteremia in cancer patients. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1970, 240–244.

  3. Bodey, G. P.: Epidemiological studies ofPseudomonas species in patients with leukemia. American Journal of Medical Sciences 1970, 260: 82–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gould, I. M., Wise, R.:Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical manifestation and management. Lancet 1985, ii: 1224–1226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bodey, G. P., Bolivar, R., Fainstein, V., Jadeja, I.: Infections caused byPseudomonas aeruginosa. Reviews of Infectious Diseases 1983, 5: 279–313.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards: Performance standards for antimicrobial disc susceptibility tests. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova PA, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goldmann, D. A., Macone, A. B.: A microbiological approach to the investigation of bacterial nosocomial infection outbreaks. Infection Control 1980, 1: 391–400.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barry, A. L., Coyle, M. B., Thornsberry, C., Gerlach, E. H., Hawkinson, R. W.: Methods of measuring zones of inhibition with the Bauer-Kirby disk susceptibility test. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1979, 10: 885–889.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fyfe, J. A. M., Harris, G., Govan, J. R. W.: Revised pyocin typing method forPseudomonas aeruginosa. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1984, 20: 47–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Govan, J. R. W.: Pyocin typing ofPseudomonas aeruginosa. In: Bergan, T., Norris, J. R. (ed.): Methods in microbiology. Volume 10. Academic Press, London, 1978, p. 61–91.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Anderberg, R. M.: Cluster analysis for applications. Academic Press, New York, 1973, p. 99–132.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Orloci, L.: Multivariate analysis in vegetation research. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pinner, R. W., Haley, R. W., Blumenstein, B. A., Shaberg, D. R., Von Allmen, S. D., McGowan, Jr. J. E.: High cost nosocomial infections. Infection Control 1982, 3: 143–149.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dixon, R. E.: Effect of infections on hospital care. Annals of Internal Medicine 1978, 89: 749–753.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Goldmann, D. A., Macone, A. B.: A microbiologic approach to the investigation of bacterial nosocomial infection outbreaks. Infection Control 1980, 1: 391–400.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Goldmann, D. A.: Laboratory procedures for infection control. In Lennette, E. H., Balows, A., Hausier, Jr. W. J., Truant, J. P. (ed.): Manual of clinical microbiology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, 1980, p. 939–951.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Centers for Disease Control: The Role of the microbiology Laboratory in surveillance and control of nosocomial infections. National Nosocomial Infections Study Report. Annual Summary, Atlanta 1974.

  18. Barry, A. L., Schoenknecht, F. D., Shadomy, S.: Inter-laboratory variability of disk diffusion and agar dilution susceptibility tests with cefamandole and cephalothin. Current Microbiology 1978, 1: 277–280.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Flournoy, D. J.: Quantitative antibiograms as a potential tool for epidemiological typing. Infection Control 1982, 3: 384–387.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Aber, R. C., Mackel, D. C.: Epidemiologic typing of nosocomial microorganisms. American Journal of Medicine 1981, 70: 899–905.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giacca, M., Monti-Bragadin, C. Multivariate analysis of antibiograms for typingPseudomonas aeruginosa . Eur. J, Clin. Microbiol. 6, 552–558 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02014245

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02014245

Keywords

Navigation