Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of adherence and urine growth rate properties ofStaphylococcus saprophyticus andStaphylococcus epidermidis

  • Short Reports
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To compare the adherence properties ofStaphylococcus saprophyticus andStaphylococcus epidermidis in vitro studies were conducted with clinical isolates and cell culture monolayers (Hela, Vero, MDCK).Staphylococcus saprophyticus exhibited greater cell adherence, but no significant difference in mean urine growth rate. Its cell-adherence properties seem to explain in part its virulence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gemmel, C. G.: New developments among the coagulase-negative stathylococci. Clinical Microbiology Newsletter 1980, 2: 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gillespia, W. A., Sellin, M. A., Gill, P., Stephens, M., Tuckwell, L. A., Wilton, A. L.: Urinary tract infection in young women with special reference toStaphynococcus saprophyticus. Journal of Clinical Pathology 1978, 31: 348–350.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jordan, P. A., Irvani, A., Richard, G., Barr, H.: Urinary tract infection caused byStaphylococcus saprophyticus. Journal of infectious Disease 1980, 142: 510–515.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sellin, M., Cooke, D. I., Gillespie, W. A., Sylvester, D. G. H., Anderson, J. D.: Micrococcal urinary tract infections in young women. Lancet 1975, ii: 570–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ofek, I., Beachey, E. H.: General concepts and principles of bacterial adherence in animals and man. In: Beachey, E. H. (ed.): Bacterial adherence. Chapman and Hall Ltd., London, 1980, p. 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Colleen, S., Hovelius, B., Wieslander, A., Mardh, P. A.: Surface properties ofStaphylococcus saprophyticus andStaphylococcus epidermidis as studied by adherence tests and two-polymer, aqueous phase systems. Acta Pathologica et Microbiologica Scandinavia 1979 (B), 87: 321–328.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mardh, P.-A., Colleen, S., Hovelius, B.: Attachment of bacteria to exfoliated cells from the urogenital tract. Investigative Urology 1979, 16: 322–326.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kloss, W. E., Schleifer, K. H.: Simplified scheme for routine identification of humanStaphylococcus species. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1975, 1: 82–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sabath, L. D., Anhalt, J. P.: Assay of antibiotics. In: Lennette, E. H., Balows, A., Hausier, W. J., Truant, J. P. (ed.): Manual of clinical microbiology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C., 1980, p. 485–489.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson, J. D., Forshaw, H. L., Adams, M. A., Gillespie, W. A., Sellin, M. A.: The relevance of growth rate in urine to the pathogenesis of urinary tract infections due toMicrococcus subgroup 3 (Staphylococcus saprophyticus biotype 3). Journal of Medical Microbiology 1976, 9: 317–323.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Almeida, R.J., Jorgensen, J.H. Comparison of adherence and urine growth rate properties ofStaphylococcus saprophyticus andStaphylococcus epidermidis . Eur. J, Clin. Microbiol. 3, 542–545 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02013615

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02013615

Keywords

Navigation