Abstract
The in vitro activity of 3-0-demethyl fortimicin A was compared to that of amikacin and tobramycin against 5,230 clinical isolates in four institutions. Amikacin and tobramycin were more active than 3-0-demethyl fortimicin A againstPseudomonas aeruginosa andAcinetobacter spp., but all three drugs had similar activity against theEnterobacteriaceae andStaphylococcus aureus. Additional tests with 335 representative gram-negative bacilli compared five different aminoglycosides, demonstrating differences with some isolates. Standardized disk diffusion tests were also performed with 30μg 3-0-demethyl fortimicin A disks, according to the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. The following interpretive breakpoints are proposed: ⩽ 11 mm for resistant (MIC ⩾32μg/ml) and ⩾ 15 mm for susceptible (MIC ⩽ 16μg/ml).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Martin, J. R., Johnson, P., Tadanier, J., Goldstein, A.: Synthesis of 3-0-demethyl fortimicin. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1980, 18: 761–765.
Jones, R. N., Barry, A. L., Fuchs, P. C., Gavan, T. L., Sommers, H. M., Gerlach, E. H.: Fortimicin A: A collaborative in vitro susceptibility comparison with amikacin and gentamicin against 11,840 clinical bacterial isolates. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1979, 16: 823–826.
Jones, R. N., Thornsberry, C., Barry, A. L., Packer, R. R., Baker, C. N., Badal, R. E.: Compound A49759, the 3-0-demethyl derivative of fortimicin A: in vitro comparison with six other aminoglycoside antibiotics. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1980, 18: 773–779.
Neu, H. C.: The in vitro activity of 0-demethylfortimicin. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 1983, 11: 181–185.
Girolami, R. L., Stamm, J. M.: Comparative antimicrobial activity of 0-demethyl fortimicin A, a derivative of fortimicin A. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1980, 18: 766–772.
Bauer, A. W., Kirby, W. M. M., Sherris, J. C., Turck, M.: Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized disk method. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 1966, 45: 493–496.
NCCLS Tentative Standard, M2-T3: Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova, PA, 1983, p. 1–38.
NCCLS Tentative Standard, M7-T: Standard Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova, PA, 1983, p. 1–31.
Miller, G. H., Sabatelli, F. J., Hare, R. S., Waitz, J. A.: Survey of aminoglycoside resistance patterns. Developments in Industrial Microbiology 1980, 21: 91–104.
Barry, A. L., Thornsberry, C., Jones, R. N.: Proposed zone standards for interpretation of fortimicin A disk diffusion tests. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1983, 18: 440–442.
Barry, A. L., Thornsberry, C., Jones, R. N.: Gentamicin and amikacin disk susceptibility tests withPseudomonas aeruginosa; definition of minimal inhibitory concentration correlates for susceptible and resistant categories. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1981, 13: 1000–1003.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barry, A.L., Jones, R.N., Thornsberry, C. et al. 3-0-demethyl fortimicin A: In vitro activity and interpretive zone standards for disk diffusion susceptibility tests. Eur. J, Clin. Microbiol. 3, 531–537 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02013613
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02013613