Skip to main content
Log in

Use of discriminative models ofPseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia in granulocytopenic rats for testing antimicrobial efficacy

  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The efficacy of single agent and combination antibiotic therapy was evaluated in rats with severe granulocytopenia andPseudomonas aeruginosa infection using animal survival, rates of bacteremia and the emergence of resistant organisms as criteria. In this model end points following single agent therapy with imipenem/cilastatin and the synergistic combination of moxalactam plus amikacin were comparable. At a high bacterial challenge dose, equivalent results were obtained using single agent therapy with either piperacillin or ticarcillin. Results were also similar following therapy with piperacillin or ticarcillin in synergistic combination with amikacin. At a lower bacterial challenge dose, aminoglycoside therapy was superior to therapy with the beta-lactams. Therapy with the in vitro synergistic double beta-lactam combination of ceftazidime plus piperacillin was no more effective than therapy with the individual compounds. Results from these studies in this discriminative animal model have in part been used to formulate prospective clinical antibiotic studies in granulocytopenic cancer patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bender, J. F., Schimpff, S. G., Young, V. M., Fortner, C. L., Love, L. J., Broullet, M. D., Wienik, P. H.: A comparative trial of tobramycin versus gentamicin in combination with vancomycin and nystatin for alimentary tract suppression in leukemic patients. European Journal of Cancer 1979, 15: 35–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson, D. E., Calia, F. M., Snyder, M. J., Warren, J. W., Schimpff, S. C.: Imipenem therapy ofPseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia in neutropenic rats. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 1983, Supplement D: 89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andriole, V. T.: Synergy of carbenicillin and gentamicin in experimental infection withPseudomonas. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1971, 124, Supplement: 46–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lumish, R. M., Norden, C. W.: Therapy of neutropenic rats infected withPseudomonas aeruginosa. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1976, 133: 538–547.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Scott, R. E., Robson, H. G.: Synergistic activity of carbenicillin and gentamicin in experimentalPseudomonas bacteremia in neutropenic rats. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1976, 10: 646–651.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Reed, L. J., Meunch, H. A.: A simple method of estimating fifty percent endpoints. American Journal of Hygiene 1938, 27: 493–497.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kluge, R. M., Standiford, H. C., Tatem, B., Young, V. M., Schimpff, S. C., Greene, W. H., Calia, F. M., Hornick, R. B.: The carbenicillin-gentamicin combination againstPseudomonas aeruginosa. Annals of Internal Medicine 1974, 81: 584–587.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cox, D. R.: Regression models and life tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1972, 34: 187–200.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Standiford, H. C., Johnson, D. E., Schimpff, S. C.: Role of antimicrobial synergism in infected granulocytopenic patients. European Journal of Clinical Oncology 1984, 20: 1007–1010.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Keating, M. J., Bodey, G. P., Valdivieso, M., Rodriguez, V.: A randomized trial of three aminoglycosides — comparison of continuous infusions of gentamicin, amikacin and sisomicin combined with carbenicillin in the treatment of infections in neutropenic patients with malignancies. Medicine 1979, 58: 159–170.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Klastersky, J., Cappel, R., Daneau, D.: Clinical significance of in vitro synergism between antibiotics in gram-negative infections. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1972, 2: 470–475.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Danhauer, F. J., Fortner, C. L., Schimpff, S. C., de Jongh, C. A., Wesley, M. N., Wiernik, P. H.: Ototoxicity and pharmacokinetically determined dosages of amikacin in granulocytopenic cancer patients. Clinical Pharmacology 1982, 1: 539–543.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wade, J. C., Schimpff, S. C., Newman, K. A., Fortner, C. L., Standifoid, H. C., Wiernik, P. H.: Piperacillin or ticarcillin plus amikacin. A double-blind prospective comparison of empiric antibiotic therapy for febrile granulocytopenic cancer patients. American Journal of Medicine 1981, 71: 983–990.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Klasterky, J., Meunier-Carpentier, F., Prevost, J.: Significance of antimicrobial synergism for the outcome of gram-negative sepsis. American Journal of Medical Science 1977, 273: 157–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Winston, D. J., Ho, W. G., Young, L. S., Hewitt, W. L., Gale, R. P.: Piperacillin plus amikacin therapyΝ carenicillin plus amikacin in febrile, granulocytopenic patients. Archives of Internal Medicine 1982, 142: 1663–1667.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Neu, H. C., Labthavikul, P.: In vitro activity andgb- lactamase stability of a monolactam, SQ 26,917, compared with those of aztreonam and other agents. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1983, 24: 227–232.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, D. Use of discriminative models ofPseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia in granulocytopenic rats for testing antimicrobial efficacy. Eur. J, Clin. Microbiol. 4, 207–212 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02013599

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02013599

Keywords

Navigation