Calcified Tissue Research

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 237–241 | Cite as

Correlation of freeze-fracture and scanning electron microscopy of epiphyseal chondrocytes

  • Thomas K. Borg
  • Raymond B. Runyan
  • Roy E. Wuthier


Chondrocytes in epiphyseal cartilage were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using freeze-fracture techniques. Freeze-fracture replicas showed large numbers of fingerlike, 0.11–0.15 μm diameter, projections from the chondrocyte surface, with numerous 95–180 Å diameter intramembranous particles associated with both the cell membrane surface and these projections. With SEM, these cytoplasmic projections were also obvious, but appeared collapsed into clusters of globular-shaped projections on the surface of the chondrocytes. With freeze-fracture techniques, in which shrinkage artifacts were essentially eliminated, the cytoplasmic projections were often seen in intimate contact with the extracapsular matrix. However, with chondrocytes prepared by both SEM and conventional TEM, there was evidence of shrinkage, the cytoplasmic projections having little contact with the extracapsular matrix. These findings show that the cytoplasmic processes are not artifacts of tissue processing and provide morphological evidence in support of the hypothesis that matrix vesicles are of cellular origin.

Key words

Epiphyseal chondrocytes Freezefracture Scanning electron microscopy Cell processes Membrane particles 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Anderson, H.C.: Vesicles associated with calcification in the matrix of epiphyseal cartilage, J. Cell Biol.41:59–72, 1969PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bonucci, E.: Fine structure and histochemistry of “calcifying globules” in epiphyseal cartilage, Z. Zellforsch. Mikrosk. Anat.103:192–217, 1970PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Holtrop, M.E.: The ultrastructure of the epiphyseal plate. II. The hypertropic chondrocyte, Calcif. Tissue Res.9:140–151, 1972PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zimny, M.L., Redler, I.: Scanning electron microscopy of chondrocytes, Acta Anat. (Basel)83:398–402, 1972Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lufti, A.M.: The ultrastructure of cartilage cells in the epiphyseal plate of long bones in the domestic fowl, Acta Anta. (Basel)87:12–21, 1974Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bozdech, A., Horn, V.: The morphology of growth cartilage using the scanning electron microscope, Acta Orthop. Scand.46:561–568, 1975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Savostin-Asling, I., Asling, C.E.: Transmission and scanning electron microscope studies of calcified cartilage resorption. Anat. Rec.,193:373–391, 1975Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clarke, I.C.: Articular cartilage: A review and scanning electron microscope study. II. The territorial fibrillar architecture, J. Anat.117:261–280, 1974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rabinovitch, A.L., Anderson, H.C.: Biogenesis of matrix vesicles in cartilage growth plates, Fed. Proc.35:112–116, 1976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Spycher, M.A., Moor, H., Ruettner, J.E.: Electron microscopic investigations on ageing and osteoarthrotic human articular cartilage. II. The fine structures of freeze-etched ageing hip joint cartilage, Z. Zellforsch. Microsk. Anat.98:512–524, 1969Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wuthier, R.E., Majeska, R.J., Collins, G.M.: Biosynthesis of matrix vesicles in epiphyseal cartilage. I. In vivo incorporation of32P-orthophosphate into phospholipids of chondrocytes membrane, and matrix vesicle fractions, Calcif. Tissue Res.23:135–139, 1977PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas K. Borg
    • 1
  • Raymond B. Runyan
    • 1
  • Roy E. Wuthier
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PathologyUniversity of South CarolinaColumbia
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry, School of MedicineUniversity of South CarolinaColumbia

Personalised recommendations