Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative histology of bone: A computerized method of measuring the total mineral content of bone

  • Published:
Calcified Tissue Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A comparatively simple quantitative method for assessing bone morphology has been evolved. Microradiographs of thin sections of mandible have been scanned with a Joyce-Loebl double beam recording microdensitometer with a scanning autodensidater attachment, using a white beam. For each image the optical densities for all the pixels (picture elements) were divided into 10 groups. The limits of the division were fixed by the maximum and minimum densities occurring within the image. A computer generated map was produced which indicated the spatial distribution of the pixels within each group to which an arbitrarily chosen shading was attached. The number of pixels within each group is also shown on the map. The computer map was compared with the photomicrograph and, where necessary, the original section. The fractional area of hard tissue was then readily determined using the numerical values of each group of pixels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jowsey, J., Kelly, P.J., Riggs, B.L., Bianco, A.J.: Quantitative microradiographic studies of normal and osteoporotic bone. Jour. of Bone and Joint Surg.47A, 785–807 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Colbert, C., Mazess, R.B., Schmidt, P.B.: Bone mineral determination in vitro by radiographic photodensitometry and direct photon absorptiometry. Investigative Radiology5, 336–340 (1970)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chalmers, J., Weaver, J.V.: Cancellous bone, its strength and changes with aging and an evaluation of some methods for measuring its mineral content. Jour. Bone and Joint Surg.48A, 299–308 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Morgan, D.B., Stanley, J., Fourman, P.: The mineral deficit in osteomalacic bone. Clinical Science35, 337–345 (1968)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Atkinson, P.J., Woodhead, C.: Changes in human mandibular structure with age. Arch. Oral Biol.13, 1453–1463 (1968)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Frost, H.M.: Lamellar osteoid mineralized per day in man. Henry Ford Hospital Medical Bulletin8, 267–272 (1960)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Frost, H.M.: Relation between bone tissue and cell population dynamics, histology and tetracycline labelling. Clinical Orthopaedics49, 65–87 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Garner, A., Ball, J.: Quantitative observations on mineralized and unmineralized bone in chronic renal azotaemia and intestinal malabsorption syndrome. Jour. Path. and Bact.91, 545–568 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Garrick, R., Doman, P., Posen, S.: Quantitative histology of bone: the use of a computer programme and results in normal subjects. Clinical Science43, 789–797 (1972)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Phillips, H.B., Owen-Jones, S. & Chandler, B. Quantitative histology of bone: A computerized method of measuring the total mineral content of bone. Calc. Tis Res. 26, 85–89 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02013239

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02013239

Key words

Navigation