Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of four methods for screening of cytomegalovirus antibodies in normal donors and immunocompromised patients

  • Articles
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three commercial methods (enzyme immunoassay, fluoroimmunoassay and latex agglutination) and a complement fixation test were compared for detection of cytomegalovirus antibodies using a panel of 490 serum samples from blood and organ donors, from immunocompromised patients and paired sera from five patients with recent cytomegalovirus infection. An indirect immunofluorescence test for antibodies to cytomegalovirus was used for classifying samples giving discrepant results by any of the four methods. All methods showed high sensitivity and specificity, but the enzyme immunoassay and the latex agglutination tests had the highest sensitivity. Latex agglutination is recommended for large-scale screening of cytomegalovirus antibodies in blood and organ donors. Negative results obtained by latex agglutination should be confirmed by sensitive enzyme immunoassays.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jordan, M. C.: Latent infection and the elusive cytomegalovirus. Reviews of Infectious Diseases 1983, 5: 205–215.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Adler, S. P.: Transfusion associated cytomegalovirus infections. Reviews of Infectious Diseases 1983, 5: 977–993.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Onorato, I. M., Morens, D. M., Martone, W. I., Stansfield, S. K.: Epidemiology of cytomegaloviral infections: recommendation for prevention and control. Reviews of Infectious Diseases 1985, 7: 479–497.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grist, N. R., Bell, E. J., Follett, E. A. C., Urquhart, G. E. D.: Diagnostic methods in clinical virology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1979, p. 95–115.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kettering, J. D., Schmidt, N. J., Lennette, E. H.: Improved glycine extracted complement fixing antigen for human cytomegalovirus. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1977, 6: 647–649.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Griner, P. F., Mayewski, R., Mushlin, A., Greenland, P.: Selection and interpretation of diagnostic test and procedures. Annals of Internal Medicine 1981, 94: 553–600.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Beckwith, D. G., Halstead, D. C., Alpaugh, K., Schweder, A., Blount-Fronefield, D. A., Toth, K.: Comparison of a latex agglutination test with five other methods for determining the presence of antibody against cytomegalovirus. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1985, 21: 328–331.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Adler, S. P., McVoy, M., Biro, V. G., Britt, W. J., Hider, P., Marshall, D.: Detection of cytomegalovirus antibody with latex agglutination. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1985, 22: 68–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McHugh, T., Casavant, C. H., Wilber, J. C., Stiles, D. P.: Comparison of six methods for detection of antibody to cytomegalovirus. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1985, 22: 1014–1019.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Ory, F., León, P., Domingo, C. et al. Comparison of four methods for screening of cytomegalovirus antibodies in normal donors and immunocompromised patients. Eur. J, Clin. Microbiol. 6, 402–405 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02013094

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02013094

Keywords

Navigation