Skip to main content
Log in

Transvaginal ultrasound in a children's hospital: is it worthwhile?

  • Originals
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We report our experience with transvaginal sonography (TVS) in 35 nonpregnant adolescent and young teenage females referred for pelvic sonography. We assessed the efficacy of TVS as compared to transabdominal sonography (TAS) in 40 examinations. Of the 40 examinations, there were 5 discrepancies. In 4, abnormalities were detected on TVS not seen on TAS. In one there was a false-positive TAS with bowel recognized as such on TVS. Image quality (clarity, completeness, anatomic detail) was judged better by two reviewers on TVS in 85% of cases but additional useful information given in 58% of patients. TVS provided greater diagnostic confidence in 30% of patients with possible PID by better demonstration of fluid in the endometrial canal, pyosalpinx or tubo-ovarian abscess, or by better characterization of free pelvic fluid. The average scan time required for TVS was 8 minutes. TVS was better tolerated than TAS in the majority of patients. TVS is a relatively easy, rapid imaging technique that is well tolerated. It enhances anatomic detail and helps to elucidate unclear findings on TAS. TVS is also helpful in obsese patients and those unable to maintain a full bladder. It should be considered a useful and worthwhile adjunct to TAS in the evaluation of adolescent and teenagers with pelvic diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schwimer SR, Lebovic J (1984) Transvaginal pelvic ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 3:381

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pennell RG, Baltarowich OH, Kurtz AB, et al. (1987) Complicated first-trimester pregnancies: Evaluation with endovaginal ultrasound vs. transabdominal technique. Radiology 165:79

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nyberg DA, Mack LA, Jeffrey RB, Laing FC (1987) Endovaginal sonographic evaluation of ectopic pregnancy: a prospective study. AJR 149:1181

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mendelson EB, Bohm-Velez M, Joseph N, Neiman HL (1988) Endometrial abnormalities. Evaluation with transvaginal sonography. AJR 150:139

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Leibman AJ, Kruse B, McSweeney MB (1988) Transvaginal sonography: Comparison with transabdominal sonography in the diagnosis of pelvic masses. AJR 151:89

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yeh H-C, Futterweit W, Thorton JC (1987) Polycystic ovarian disease: Ultrasound features in 104 patients. Radiology 163:111

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mitchell DG (1988) Magnetic resonance imaging of the adnexa. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 9:143

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Golden N, Cohen H, Gennari G, Neuhoff S (1987) The use of pelvic ultrasonography in the evaluation of adolescents with pelvic inflammatory disease. Am J Dis Child 141:1235

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Swayne LC, Love MB, Karasick SR (1984) Pelvic inflammatory disease: Sonographic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 151:751

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Patten RM, Vincent LM, Wolner-Hanssen P, Thorpe E Jr (1990) Pelvic inflammatory disease. Endovaginal sonography with laparoscopic correlation. J Ultrasound Med 9:681

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mendelson EB, Bohm-Velez M, Joseph N, Neiman HL (1988) Gynecologic imaging: comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal sonography. Radiology 166:321

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tessler FN, Schiller VL, Perella RR, Sutherland ML, Grant EG (1989) Transabdominal versus endovaginal pelvic sonography: prospective study: Radiology 170:553

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bellah, R.D., Rosenberg, H.K. Transvaginal ultrasound in a children's hospital: is it worthwhile?. Pediatr Radiol 21, 570–574 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02012600

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02012600

Keywords

Navigation