Advertisement

Microbial Ecology

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 149–161 | Cite as

Habitable pore space and survival ofRhizobium leguminosarum biovartrifolii introduced into soil

  • J. Postma
  • J. A. van Veen
Article

Abstract

The hypothesis that the population size of introduced bacteria is affected by habitable pore space was studied by varying moisture content and bulk density in sterilized, as well as in natural loamy sand and silt loam. The soils were inoculated withRhizobium leguminosarum biovartrifolii and established and maintained at soil water potentials between −5 and −20 kPa (pF 1.7 and 2.3). Rhizobial cells were enumerated when population sizes were expected to be more or less stable. In sterilized soils, the rhizobial numbers were not affected or decreased only slightly when water potentials increased from −20 to −5 kPa. In natural soils, the decrease in rhizobial numbers with increasing water potentials was more pronounced. Bulk density had only minor effects on the population sizes of rhizobia or total bacteria. Soil water retention curves of both soils were used to calculate volume and surface area of pores from different diameter classes, and an estimation of the habitable pore space was made. Combining these values of the theoretical habitable pore space with the measured rhizobial numbers showed that only 0.37 and 0.44% of the habitable pore space was occupied in the sterilized loamy sand and silt loam, respectively. The situation in natural soil is more complicated, since a whole variety of microorganisms is present. Nevertheless, it was suggested that, in general, pore space does not limit proliferation and growth of soil microorganisms.

Keywords

Population Size Soil Water Bulk Density Water Potential Rhizobium 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Acea MJ, Moore CR, Alexander M (1988) Survival and growth of bacteria introduced into soil. Soil Biol Biochem 20:509–515Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adu JK, Oades JM (1978) Physical factors influencing decomposition of organic materials in soil aggregates. Soil Biol Biochem 10:109–115Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bhaumik HD, Clark FE (1947) Soil moisture tension and microbiological activity. Proc Soil Sci Soc Am 12:234–238Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bisdom EBA, Thiel F (1981) Backscattered electron scanning images of porosities in thin sections of soils, weathered rocks and oil-gas reservoir rocks using SEM-EDXRA. In: Bisdom EBA (ed) Submicroscopy of soils and weathered rocks. 1st Workshop of the International Working-Group on Submicroscopy of Undisturbed Soil Materials (IWGSUSM) 1980, Pudoc, Wageningen, pp 191–206Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boonkerd N, Weaver RW (1982) Survival of cowpea rhizobia in soil as affected by soil temperature and moisture. Appl Environ Microbiol 43:585–589Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clark FE (1967) Bacteria in soil. In: Burges A, Raw F (eds) Soil biology. Academic Press, London, pp 15–49Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crozat Y, Cleyet-Marel JC, Giraud JJ, Obaton M (1982) Survival rates ofRhizobium japonicum populations introduced into different soils. Soil Biol Biochem 14:401–405Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Crozat Y, Cleyet-Marel JC, Corman A (1987) Use of the fluorescent antibody technique to characterize equilibrium survival concentrations ofBradyrhizobium japonicum strains in soil. Biol Fertil Soils 4:85–90Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Currie JA (1961) Gaseous diffusion in the aeration of aggregated soils. Soil Sci 92:40–45Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Darbyshire JF (1976) Effect of water suctions on the growth in soil of the ciliateColpoda steini, and the bacteriumAzotobacter chroococcum. J Soil Sci 27:369–376Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Darbyshire JF, Robertson L, Mackie LA (1985) A comparison of two methods of estimating the soil pore network available to protozoa. Soil Biol Biochem 17:619–624Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Elliott ET, Anderson RV, Coleman DC, Cole CV (1980) Habitable pore space and microbial trophic interaction. OIKOS 35:327–335Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Elsas JD van, Trevors JT, Overbeek LS van, Starodub ME (1989) Survival ofPseudomonas fluorescens containing plasmids RP4 or pRK2501 and plasmid stability after introduction into two soils of different texture. Can J Microbiol 35:951–959Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Foster RC, Rovira AD, Cook TW (1983) Ultrastructure of the root-soil interface. The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Griffin DM (1981) Water potential as a selective factor in the microbial ecology of soils. In: Parr JF, Gardner WR, Elliott LF (eds) Water potential relations in soil microbiology. Soil Science Society of America, Special Publication 9, pp 141–151Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hattori T, Hattori R (1976) The physical environment in soil microbiology: An attempt to extend principles of microbiology to soil microorganisms. Crit Rev Microbiol 4:423–461PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heynen CE, Elsas JD van, Kuikman PJ, Veen JA van (1988) Dynamics ofRhizobium leguminosarum biovartrifolii introduced into soil; the effect of bentonite clay on predation by protozoa. Soil Biol Biochem 20:483–488Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hissett R, Gray TRG (1976) Microsites and time changes in soil microbe ecology. In: Anderson JM, MacFadyen A (eds) The role of terrestrial and aquatic organisms in the composition process. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 23–39Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Howie WJ, Cook RJ, Weller DM (1987) Effects of soil matric potential and cell motility on wheat root colonization by fluorescent Pseudomonads suppressive to take-all. Phytopathology 77:286–292Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jager A, Boersma O, Bisdom EBA (1983) The characterization of microporosity in a ploughpan by submicroscopic and quantimet techniques. Geoderma 30:277–283Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jordan DC (1984)Rhizobiaceae. In: Krieg NR, Holt JG (eds) Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology, Vol. 1. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 234–244Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kilbertus G (1980) Etude des microhabitats contenus dans les agrégats du sol. Leur relation avec la biomasse bactérienne et la taille des procaryotes présents. Rev Ecol Biol Sol 17:543–557Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Klute A (1986) Water retention: Laboratory methods. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis, Part I. Physical and mineralogical methods. Agronomy Monograph No. 9. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 635–662Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kuikman PJ, Vuuren MMI van, Veen JA van (1990) Effect of soil moisture regime on predation by protozoa of bacterial biomass and the release of bacterial nitrogen. Agric Ecosystems Environ (in press)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Labeda DP, Kang-Chien Liu, Casida LE Jr (1976) Colonization of soil byArthrobacter andPseudomonas under varying conditions of water and nutrient availability as studied by plate counts and transmission electron microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol 31:551–561PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McLaren AD (1977) The seven questions of Selman A. Waksman (Editorial). Soil Biol Biochem 9:375–376Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Miller MS, Pepper IL (1988) Survival of a fast-growing strain of lupin rhizobia in sonoran desert soils. Soil Biol Biochem 20:323–327Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nannipieri P, Muccini L, Ciardi C (1983) Microbial biomass and enzyme activities: Production and persistence. Soil Biol Biochem 15:679–685Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nioh T, Furusaka G (1972) Studies on glycine-percolated soil. IV. Fractionation of bacteria in glycine-percolated soil in “two-layered sucrose solution system” Soil Sci Plant Nutr 18:219–223Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Osa-Afiana LO, Alexander M (1979) Effect of moisture on the survival ofRhizobium in soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 43:925–930Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ozawa T, Yamaguchi M (1986) Fractionation and estimation of particle-attached and unattachedBradyrhizobium japonicum strains in soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 52:911–914Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Papendick RI, Campbell GS (1981) Theory and measurement of water potential. In: Parr JF, Gardner WR, Elliott LF (eds) Water potential relations in soil microbiology, Soil Science Society of America, Special Publication 9, pp 1–22Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Postma J, Elsas JD van, Govaert JM, Veen JA van (1988) The dynamics ofRhizobium leguminosarum biovartrifolii introduced into soil as determined by immunofluorescence and selective plating techniques. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 53:251–260Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Postma J, Hok-A-Hin CH, Oude Voshaar JH (1990) Influence of the inoculum density on the growth and survival ofRhizobium leguminosarum biovartrifolii introduced into sterile and nonsterile loamy sand and silt loam. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 73:49–58Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Postma J, Hok-A-Hin CH, Veen JA van (1990) Role of microniches in protecting introducedRhizobium leguminosarum biovartrifolii against competition and predation in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 56Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Postma J, Walter S, Veen JA van (1989) Influence of different initial soil moisture contents on the distribution and population dynamics of introducedRhizobium leguminosarum biovartrifolii. Soil Biol Biochem 21:437–442Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ramirez C, Alexander M (1980) Evidence suggesting protozoan predation onRhizobium associated with germinating seeds and in the rhizosphere of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Appl Environ Microbiol 40:492–499Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Seifert J (1965) Ecology of soil microbes. Acta Universitatis Carolinae-Biologica 3:245–272Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Smart P (1975) Soil microstructure. Soil Sci 119:385–393Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Steinberg C, Faurie G, Zegerman M, Pave A (1987) Regulation par les protozoaires d'une population bactérienne introduite dans le sol. Modélisation mathématique de la relation prédateur-proie. Rev Ecol Biol Sol 24:49–62Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Vargas R, Hattori T (1986) Protozoan predation of bacterial cells in soil aggregates. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 38:233–242Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Postma
    • 1
  • J. A. van Veen
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Institute ItalWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations