Advertisement

Microbial Ecology

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 323–330 | Cite as

Effects of temperature on microbial utilization of lignocellulosic detritus in a thermally impacted stream

  • Ronald Benner
  • J. Vaun McArthur
Article

Abstract

The effects of temperature on rates of mineralization of [14C]lignocellulose were investigated in water and sediment from a thermally impacted stream and from a nearby unimpacted swamp at the Savannah River Plant, South Carolina. The temperature optimum for lignocellulose mineralization remained near 35°C at the unimpacted site throughout the sampling period from November 1986 to May 1987. The temperature optimum for lignocellulose mineralization in the thermally impacted stream was near 45°C when thermal effluents from a nuclear reactor were released to the stream, and was near 35°C when the reactor was not operating. Microbial populations capable of rapidly degrading lignocellulose at higher temperatures (45–55°C) developed between 9 and 27 days under conditions of thermal stress, indicating that under favorable conditions thermophilic microorganisms became dominant components of the microbiota. Removal of thermal stress for periods of 75 days or less resulted in a collapse of the thermophilic degrading population.

Keywords

Sampling Period Thermal Stress Nature Conservation Detritus Favorable Condition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Benner R, Maccubbin AE, Hodson RE (1984) Preparation, characterization, and microbial degradation of specifically radiolabeled14C-lignocelluloses from marine and freshwater macrophytes. Appl Environ Microbiol 47:381–389Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benner R, Newell SY, Maccubbin AE, Hodson RE (1984) Relative contributions of bacteria and fungi to rates of degradation of lignocellulosic detritus in salt-marsh sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 48:36–40Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benner R, Moran MA, Hodson RE (1985) Effects of pH and plant source on lignocellulose biodegradation rates in two wetland ecosystems, the Okefenokee Swamp and a Georgia salt marsh. Limnol Oceanogr 30:489–499Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benner R, Maccubbin AE, Hodson RE (1986) Temporal relationship between the deposition and microbial degradation of lignocellulosic detritus in a Georgia salt marsh and the Okefenokee Swamp. Microb Ecol 12:291–298Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Benner R, Moran MA, Hodson RE (1986) Biogeochemical cycling of lignocellulosic carbon in marine and freshwater ecosystems: relative contributions of procaryotes and eucaryotes. Limnol Oceanogr 31:89–100Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fenchel TM, Jorgensen BB (1977) Detritus food chains of aquatic ecosystems: the role of bacteria. In: Alexander A (ed) Advances in microbial ecology. Plenum Press, New York, PP 1–58Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Godshalk GL, Wetzel RG (1978) Decomposition of aquatic angiosperms. II. Particulate components. Aquat Bot 5:301–327Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hobbie JE, Daley RJ, Jasper S (1977) Use of nucelopore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol 33:1225–1228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Melillo JM, Aber JD, Muratore JF (1982) Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamics. Ecology 63:621–626Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moran MA, Maccubbin AE, Benner R, Hodson RE (1987) Dynamics of microbial biomass and activity in five habitats of the Okefenokee Swamp ecosystem. Microb Ecol. 14:203–217Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Odum EP, de la Cruz AA (1967) Particulate organic detritus in a Georgia salt marsh-estuarine ecosystem. In: Lauff GH (ed) Estuaries. Am Assoc Adv Sci, Washington, DC, pp 383–388Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    SAS Institute, Inc. (1982) SAS users guide: statistics. 1982 ed. SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scott ML, Sharitz RR (1985) Disturbance in a cypress-tupelo wetland and interaction between thermal loading and hydrology. Wetlands 5:53–68Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tenore KR, Cammen L, Findlay SEG, Philips N (1982) Perspectives of research on detritus: do factors controlling the availability of detritus to macroconsumers depend on its source? J Mar Res 40:473–490Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Webster JR, Benfield EF (1986) Vascular plant breakdown in freshwater ecosystems. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 17:567–594Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald Benner
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. Vaun McArthur
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Marine Science InstituteUniversity of Texas at AustinPort Aransas
  2. 2.Savannah River Ecology LaboratoryUniversity of GeorgiaAikenUSA

Personalised recommendations