Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Microbial ecology of a shallow unconfined ground water aquifer polluted by municipal landfill leachate

  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The microflora of a shallow anoxic aquifer underlying a municipal landfill in Oklahoma was characterized by direct light microscopy, most probable number determinations of sulfate reducers and methanogens, and measurements of methanogenesis in aquifer samples containing either endogenous or exogenous electron donors and various sulfate concentrations. Acridine orange direct counts of bacteria did not vary significantly with time or between 2 major sampling areas (1.70±0.16×107 to 11.2±2.1×107 cells/gdw). One site (B) was high in organic matter and low in sulfate, and methanogens generally outnumbered sulfate-reducers at most times of the year, whereas the opposite was true for another site (A). Greater than 75% of the theoretical amount of methane was detected within 7 weeks in both site A and B aquifer slurries amended with noncompetitive electron donors like methanol and trimethylamine. However, only site B slurries efficiently converted competitive donors like acetate, H2, and formate to the expected amount of methane. A mapping of sulfate and methane levels indicated that site A is relatively localized. These results suggest that the predominant flow of carbon and energy is through methanogenesis at aquifer site B whereas sulfate reduction predominated at site A. However, both methanogens and sulfate reducers could be isolated from either site.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdollahi H, Nedwell DB (1979) Seasonal temperatures as a factor influencing sulfate reduction in salt marsh sediments. Microb Ecol 5:73–79

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abram JW, Nedwell DB (1978) Inhibition of methanogenesis by sulfate-reducing bacteria competing for transferred hydrogen. Arch Microbiol 117:89–92

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Abram JW, Nedwell DB (1978) Hydrogen as a substrate for methanogenesis and sulfate reduction in anaerobic saltmarsh sediments. Arch Microbiol 117:93–97

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Balkwill DL, Ghiorse WC (1985) Characterization of subsurface bacteria associated with two shallow aquifers in Oklahoma. Appl Environ Microbiol 50:580–588

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bone TL, Balkwill DL (1986) Improved flotation technique for microscopy of in situ and sediment microorganisms. Appl Environ Microbiol 51:462–468

    Google Scholar 

  6. Braun M, Stolp H (1985) Degradation of methanol by a sulfate-reducing bacterium. Arch Microbiol 142:77–80

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bryant MP (1972) Commentary on the Hungate technique for culture of anaerobic bacteria. Am J Clin Nutr 25:1324–1328

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cappenburg TE (1974) Interaction between sulfate-reducing bacteria and methane-producing bacteria in bottom deposits of a freshwater lake. I. Field observation. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 40:285–295

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Conrad R, Phelps TJ, Zeikus JG (1985) Gas metabolism evidence in support of the juxtaposition of hydrogen-producing and methanogenic bacteria in sewage sludge and lake sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 50:595–601

    Google Scholar 

  10. Doddema HJ, Vogels GD (1978) Improved identification of methanogenic bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol 36:852–854

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ghiorse WC, Balkwill DL (1983) Enumeration and morphological characterization of bacteria indigenous to subsurface environments. Dev Ind Microbiol 24:213–224

    Google Scholar 

  12. King GM (1984) Utilization of hydrogen, acetate, and “noncompetitive” substrates by methanogenic bacteria in Maine sediments. Geomicro 3:275–306.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kristjansson JK, Schönheit P, Thauer RK (1982) Different Ks values for hydrogen of methanogenic bacteria and sulfate-reducing bacteria: an explanation for the apparent inhibition of methanogenesis by sulfate. Arch Microbiol 131:278–282

    Google Scholar 

  14. Laanbroek HJ, Pfennig N (1981) Oxidation of short-chain fatty acids by sulfate-reducing bacteria in freshwater and in marine sediments. Arch Microbiol 128:330–335

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. LeVeen PE (1985) Reports on reports. Environment 28:25–28

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lovely DR, Klug MJ (1983) Sulfate reducers can outcompete methanogens at freshwater sulfate concentrations. Appl Environ Microbiol 45:188–192

    Google Scholar 

  17. McInerney MJ, Bryant MP, Pfennig N (1979) Anaerobic bacterium that degrades fatty acids in syntrophic association with methanogens. Arch Microbiol 122:129–135

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mink RW, Dugan PR (1977) Tentative identification of methanogenic bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol 33:813–818

    Google Scholar 

  19. Oremland RS, Polcin S (1982) Methanogenesis and sulfate reduction: competitive and noncompetititve substrates in estuary sediment. Appl Environ Microbiol 44:1270–1276

    Google Scholar 

  20. Phelps TJ, Conrad R, Zeikus JG (1985) Sulfate-dependent interspecies H2 transfer betweenMethanosarcina barkeri andDesulfovibrio vulgaris during coculture metabolism of acetate or methanol. Appl Environ Microbiol 50:589–594

    Google Scholar 

  21. Postgate JR (1984) The sulfate-reducing bacteria, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  22. Reutter, Anderson, Schoor Associates, and O'Kelley, Inc. (1982) City of Norman landfill present condition, upgrading measures and future disposal alternatives. Report to the Norman city council, April 1982

  23. Robertson JM, Toussaint CR, Jorque MA (1984) Organic compounds entering ground water from a landfill. Environmental Protection Agency Technology Series. EPA report #66012-84-088, Washington, DC

  24. Robinson JA, Tiedje JM (1984) Competition between sulfate-reducing and methanogenic bacteria for H2 under resting and growing conditions. Arch Microbiol 738:26–32

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schonheit P, Kristjansson JK, Thauer RK (1982) Kinetic mechanism for the ability of sulfate reducers to outcompete methanogens for acetate. Arch Microbiol 132:285–288

    Google Scholar 

  26. Smith RL, Klug MJ (1981) Electron donors utilized by sulfate-reducing bacteria in eutrophic lake sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 42:116–121

    Google Scholar 

  27. Suflita JM, Miller GD (1985) Microbial metabolism of chlorophenolic compounds in ground water aquifers. Environ Tox Chem 4:751–758

    Google Scholar 

  28. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Drinking Water (1984) A ground water protection strategy for the environmental protection agency, pp 12–13

  29. Ventullo RM, Larson RJ (1985) Metabolic diversity and activity of heterotrophic bacteria in ground water. Environ Tox Chem 4:759–771

    Google Scholar 

  30. Webster JJ, Hampton GJ, Wilson JT, Ghiorse WC, Leach FR (1985) Determination of microbial cell numbers in subsurface samples. Ground Water 23:17–25

    Google Scholar 

  31. White DC, Nickles JS, Parker JH, Findlay RH, Gehron MS, Smith GA, Martz RF (1985) Biochemical measures of the biomass, community structure, and metabolic activity of the ground water microbiota. In: Ward CH, Giger W, McCarty PL (eds) Groundwater quality. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 307–329

    Google Scholar 

  32. Widdel F, Pfennig N (1977) A new anaerobic, sporing, acetate-oxidizing, sulfate-reducing bacterium,Desulfotomaculum (emend)acetoxidans. Arch Microbiol 112:119–122

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Widdel F, Pfennig N (1981) Studies on dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria that decompose fatty acids. I. Isolation of new sulfate-reducing bacteria enriched with acetate from saline environments. Description ofDesulfobacter postgatei gen nov., sp. nov. Arch Microbiol 129:395–400

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wilson JT, McNabb JF, Balkwill DL, Ghiorse WC (1983) Enumeration and characterization of bacteria indigenous to a shallow water table aquifer. Ground Water 21:225–233

    Google Scholar 

  35. Winfrey MR, Zeikus JG (1977) Effect of sulfate on carbon and electron flow during microbial methanogenesis in freshwater sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 33:275–281

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zehnder AJB, Wuhrmann K (1968) Physiology of a methanobacterium strain AZ. Arch Microbiol 111:199–205

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Botany and Microbiology, The University of Oklahoma, 73019, Norman, Oklahoma, USA

    Ralph E. Beeman & Joseph M. Suflita

Authors
  1. Ralph E. Beeman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joseph M. Suflita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beeman, R.E., Suflita, J.M. Microbial ecology of a shallow unconfined ground water aquifer polluted by municipal landfill leachate. Microb Ecol 14, 39–54 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02011569

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02011569

Keywords

Search

Navigation