Advertisement

Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 318–318 | Cite as

Letter to the editor

  • W. Rohrschneider
Article

References

  1. 1.
    Daneman A, Alton DJ, Ein S, Wesson D, Superina R, Thorner P (1995) Perforation during attempted intussusception reduction in children — a comparison of perforation with barium and air. Pediatr Radiol 25: 81–88CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kirks DR (1995) Air intussusception reduction: “the winds of change”. Pediatr Radiol 25: 89–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Poznanski AK (1995) Why I still use barium for intussusception. Pediatr Radiol 25: 92–93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang G, Liu S (1988) Enema reduction of intussusception by hydrostatic pressure under ultrasound guidance: a report of 377 cases. J Pediatr Surg 23: 814–818PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Woo SK, Kim JS, Suh SJ, Paik TW, Choi SO (1992) Childhood intussusception: US-guided hydrostatic reduction. Radiology 182: 77–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Riebel TW, Nasir R, Weber K (1993) US-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception in children. Radiology 188: 513–516PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rohrschneider WK, Tröger J (1995) Hydrostatic reduction of intussusception under US guidance. Pediatr Radiol (in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Rohrschneider
    • 1
  1. 1.Abteilung für Pädiatrische RadiologieUniversität HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations