Advertisement

Microbial Ecology

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 193–204 | Cite as

Influence of phagotrophic processes on the regeneration of nutrients in two-stage continuous culture systems

  • Hans Güde
Article

Abstract

Regeneration of nutrients in aquatic ecosystems may be affected by autolysis, bacterial degradation, and activities of phagotrophic organisms. To examine the relative importance of these processes, mineralization of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus was studied in a two-stage continuous culture system. In the first stage (production compartment), aChlorella sp. was grown either axenically or in the presence of bacteria under P-limited conditions. In the presence of bacteria, the biomass of algae decreased due to efficient competition for P by bacteria. In the second stage (remineralization compartment), which was kept continuously in the dark, the nutrients incorporated by the organisms in the first stage were remineralized only slightly (0–25%) irrespective of the presence or absence of bacteria. However, remineralization of all nutrients tested was strongly increased (60–80%) after addition of zooflagellates, which grazed on algae and bacteria. These observations suggest that a net regeneration of nutrients was provided by phagotrophic organisms, whereas nutrients were trapped rather than released by bacteria. It is concluded that nutrient cycling could probably not proceed at the high velocities observed in the field without the participation of phagotrophic organisms.

Keywords

Nitrogen Biomass Phosphorus Culture System Nature Conservation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alexander M (1981) Why microbial predators and parasites do not eliminate their prey and hosts. Ann Rev Microbiol 35:113–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bloesch J, Stadelmann P, Bührer H (1977) Primary production, mineralization and sedimentation in the euphotic zone of two Swiss lakes. Limnol Oceanogr 22:511–526Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cole JJ (1982) Interactions between bacteria and algae in aquatic ecosystems. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 13:291–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Currie DJ, Kalff J (1984) A comparison of the abilities of freshwater algae and bacteria to acquire and retain phosphorus. Limnol Oceanogr 29:298–310Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Currie DJ, Kalff J (1984) The relative importance of bacterioplankton and phytoplankton in phosphorus uptake in freshwater. Limnol Oceanogr 29:311–321Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Daft MJ, McCord SB, Stewart WDP (1975) Ecological studies on algal lysing bacteria in freshwaters. Freshwater Biol 5:577–596Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eppley RW, Peterson BJ (1979) Particulate organic matter flux and planktonic new production in the deep ocean. Nature 282:677–680CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fenchel T, Jørgensen BB (1977) Detritus food chains of aquatic ecosystems: the role of bacteria. Adv Microb Ecol 1:1–49Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gunnison D, Alexander M (1975) Resistance and susceptibility of algae to decomposition by natural microbial communities. Limnol Oceanogr 20:64–70Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Güde H (1984) Test for validity of different radioisotope activity measurements by microbial pure and mixed cultures. Arch Hydrobiol Beih Ergebn Limnol 19:257–266Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hargrave BT, Geen GH (1968) Phosphorus excretion by zooplankton. Limnol Oceanogr 13: 332–342Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harold FM (1966) Inorganic polyphosphates in biology: structure metabolism and function. Bact Rev 30:772–794PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Johannes RE (1964) Phosphorus excretion and body size in marine animals: microzooplankton and nutrient regeneration. Science 146:923–924Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Johannes RE (1968) Nutrient regeneration in lakes and oceans. Adv Microbiol of the Sea 1:203–213Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    King GM, Berman T (1984) Potential effects of isotopic dilution on apparent respiration in14C-heterotrophy experiments. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 19:175–180Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lampert W (1978) Release of dissolved organic carbon by grazing zooplankton. Limnol Oceanogr 23:831–834Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lean DRS, Nalewajko C (1979) Phosphorus turnover time and phosphorus demand in large and small lakes. Arch Hydrobiol Beih Ergebn Limnol 13:120–152Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maier D (1973) Eine verbesserte Methode zur Bestimmung des chemischen Sauerstoffbedarfes mit Kaliumdichromat (COD Methode) GWF, Wasser/Abwasser 114:366–370Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Müller H (1972) Wachstum und Phosphatbedarf vonNitzschia actinastroides (Lemm.) v.Goor in statischer und homokontinuierlicher Kultur unter Phosphat-Limitierung. Arch Hydrobiol Suppl 38:399–484Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ohle W (1968) Chemische und mikrobiologische Aspekte des biogenen Stoffhaushaltes der Binnengewässer. Mitt Int Ver Limnol 14:122–133Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Porter KG, Feig YS (1980) The use of DAPI for counting and identifying aquatic microflora. Limnol Oceanogr 25:943–948Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schmid M, Ambühl H (1965) Die Bestimmung geringster Mengen Gesamtphosphor in Wasser und Biomasse. Schweiz Z Hydrol 27:184–192Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sherr B, Sherr E (1984) Role of heterotrophic protozoa in carbon and energy flow in aquatic ecosystems. In: Klug MJ, Reddy EA (eds) Current perspectives in microbial ecology. ASM, Washington, pp. 412–423Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stöckli A (1984) The role of bacteria and algae in phosphorus regeneration using linked continuous cultures. Verh Int Ver Limnol (in press)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stout JD (1980) The role of protozoa in nutrient cycling and energy flow. Adv Microb Ecol 4:1–34Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tilzer MM (1984) Estimation of phytoplankton loss rates from daily photosynthetic rates and observed biomass changes in Lake Constance. J Plankton Res 6:309–319Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Van Es FB, Meyer-Reil LA (1983) Biomass and metabolic activity of heterotrophic marine bacteria. Adv Microb Ecol 6:111–170Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vogler P (1965) Beiträge zur Phosphatanalytik in der Limnologie II. Die Bestimmung des gelösten Orthophosphates. Fortschritte Wasserchemie Grenzgebiete 2:109–119Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Williams PJ leB (1981) Incorporation of microheterotrophic processes into the classical paradigm of the planktonic food web. Kieler Meeresforsch 5:1–28Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans Güde
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Seenforschung und FischereiwesenLangenargenFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations