Microbial Ecology

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 117–125 | Cite as

Variability in fermentation patterns of sugar-utilizing bacteria isolated from anaerobic, intertidal sediments

  • Hendrikus J. Laanbroek
  • Johannes P. Blok
  • Lya Steenhuis
Article

Abstract

Three dominant types of sugar-fermenting bacteria were isolated from the anaerobic, intertidal sediments of the Eems-Dollard estuary by applying techniques involving anaerobic agar shake tubes. One of the isolated types was tentatively identified as aStreptococcus species, the other two asBacteroides species. All types were versatile with respect to the utilization of sugars. The fermentation patterns of two types were dependent upon conditions of cultivation. In glucose-limited cultures ofStreptococcus strain NS.G52, the production of lactate was suppressed in favor of formate, acetate, and ethanol. In glucose-limited syntrophic cultures withMethanospirillum hungatei, Bacteroides strain NS.G42 was forced to produce acetate and hydrogen at the expense of ethanol. The fermentation pattern ofBacteroides strain NS.S42, which consisted of acetate, propionate, and succinate, was not affected by conditions of cultivation.

Keywords

Hydrogen Acetate Sugar Fermentation Agar 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Deibel RH, Seeley HW (1974) Streptococcaceae. In: Buchanan RE, Gibbons NE (eds) Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 490–509Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Van Es FB (1977) A preliminary carbon budget for a part of the Ems estuary: the Dollard. Helgoländer wiss Meeresunters 30:283–294Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fairbairn NJ (1953) A modified anthrone reagent. Chem Industry 86Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Holdeman LV, Cato ED, Moore WEC (1977) Anaerobe laboratory manual, 4th ed. VPI Anaerobe Laboratory, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, WVGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Holdeman LV, Moore WEC (1974) Bacteroidaceae. In: Buchanan RE, Gibbons NE (eds) Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 384–404Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kemp CW, Robrish SA, Curtis MA, Sharer SA, Bowen WH (1983) Application of a competition model to the growth ofStreptococcus mutans andStreptococcus sanguis in binary continuous culture. Appl Environ Microbiol 45:1277–1282PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    King GM, Klug MJ (1982) Glucose metabolism in sediments of a eutrophic lake: tracer analysis of uptake and product formation. Appl Environ Microbiol 44:1308–1317Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Laanbroek HJ, Geerligs HJ, Peijnenburg AACM, Siesling S (1983) Competition for L-lactate betweenDesulfovibrio, andVeillonella andAcetobacterium species isolated from anaerobic intertidal sediments. Microb Ecol 9:341–354Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Laanbroek HJ, Veldkamp H (1982) Microbial interactions in sediment communities. Phil Trans R Soc Lond [B] 297:533–550Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lang E, Lang H (1972) Spezifische Farbreaktion zum direkten Nachweis der Ameisensäure. Z Anal Chem 260:8–10Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lovley DR, Klug MJ (1982) Intermediary metabolism of organic matter in the sediments of a eutrophic lake. Appl Environ Microbiol 43:552–560Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Molongoski JJ, Klug MJ (1976) Characterization of anaerobic heterotrophic bacteria isolated from freshwater lake sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 31:83–90PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scheifinger CC, Latham MJ, Wolin MJ (1975) Relationship of lactate dehydrogenase specificity and growth rate to lactate metabolism bySelenomonas ruminantium. Appl Microbiol 30:916–921PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sørensen J, Christensen D, Jørgensen BB (1981) Volatile fatty acids and hydrogen as substrates for sulfate-reducing bacteria in anaerobic marine sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 42:5–11Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sørensen J, Jørgensen BB, Revsbeck NR (1979) A comparison of oxygen, nitrate and sulfate respiration in coastal marine sediments. Microb Ecol 5:105–115Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thomas TD, Ellwood DC, Longyear VMC (1979) Change from homo- to hetero-lactic fermentation byStreptococcus lactis resulting from glucose limitation in anaerobic chemostat cultures. J Bacteriol 138:109–117PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thomas TD, Turner KW (1981) Carbohydrate fermentation byStreptococcus cremoris andStreptococcus lactis growing in agar gels. Appl Environ Microbiol 41:1289–1294Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Trüper HG, Schlegel HG (1964) Sulphur metabolism in Thiorhodaceae. I. Quantitative measurements of growing cells ofChromatium okenii. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek J Microbiol Serol 30:225–238Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yamada T, Carlsson J (1975) Regulation of lactate dehydrogenase and change of fermentation products in Streptococci. J Bacteriol 124:55–61PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hendrikus J. Laanbroek
    • 1
  • Johannes P. Blok
    • 1
  • Lya Steenhuis
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of MicrobiologyUniversity of GroningenNN HarenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations