Skip to main content
Log in

Dose-response relationships between phytopathogenic bacteria and their hosts

  • Published:
Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Theories on the relationships between the challenge dose of phytopathogenic bacteria and the quantal response of the host plant are discussed and applied to experimental results. In a number of cases the extent of disease was directly proportional to the dose, which is an indication of independent action. Departures from linearity in the relationships were ascribed tointer alia a shortage of multiplication sites, antagonism amongst the cells of the pathogen and heterogeneity of the tested host plants with respect to susceptibility. In a few host-pathogen combinations, dose-response relationships showing an upward curve were found; this is probably an indication of facultative synergism. The relationships found in homologous and heterologous host-pathogen combinations were similar. The implications of the above findings for the quantitative study of factors affecting the susceptibility of plants to bacterial infection are discussed.

Samenvatting

Na een bespreking van de theorieën over de relatie tussen het aantal fytopathogene bacteriën per inoculatie en de al-of-niet respons — waarbij dus de grootte van de individuele respons niet in acht genomen wordt — worden deze theorieën getoetst aan de resultaten van proeven die in de literatuur beschreven zijn. Onderschied wordt gemaakt tussen proeven waarin de proporties en die waarin de aantallen geslaagde inoculaties bepaald zijn. Verder is een vergelijking gemaakt tussen homologe en heterologe combinaties van waardplant en pathogeen.

Waar de proporties geslaagde inoculaties werden gemeten, vond ik in een aantal gevallen evenredigheid tussen dosis en respons, mits een transformatie werd toegepast voor veelvoudige infectie. Dit is een aanduiding dat de cellen van het pathogeen elkaar niet beïnvloeden. Afwijkingen van dit rechtlijnig verband kunnen o.a. worden toegeschreven aan antagonisme tussen de cellen van het pathogeen, aan heterogeniteit in vatbaarheid van de waardplanten of aan een beperkt aantal vermeerderingsloci.

In drie gevallen werd een naar boven gekromde lijn gevonden, hetgeen waarschijnlijk wijst op facultatief synergisme.

In proeven waarin de aantallen geslaagde inoculaties gemeten werden, vond ik in de literatuur evenredige en dus rechtlijnige verbanden met afbuigingen naar rechts voor responses tot te hogere doses. De afwijkingen van rechtlijnigheid kunnen hier worden toegeschreven aan een beperkt aantal vermeerderingsloci of aan antagonisme tussen de cellen van het pathogeen.

Geen essentieel verschil in dosis-respons verhoudingen werd gevonden tussen homologen en heterologe waardplant-pathogeen combinaties.

De implicaties van bovengenoemde resultaten voor de kwantitatieve studie van factoren die de vatbaarheid van planten voor infectie door bacteriën bepalen, worden besproken.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basu, P.K., 1966. Conditions for symptomatological differentiation of bacterial canker, spot and speck on tomato seedlings. Can. J. Pl. Sci. 46: 525–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boelema, B.H., 1976. Infectivity titrations withCorynebacterium michiganense in tomato seedlings. I. The effect of the age of the seedlings at the time of inoculation. Phytophylactica 8: 41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boelema, B.H., 1984. Infectivity titrations with race 2 ofPseudomonas syringae pv.Phaseolicola in green beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Phytophylactica 16: 327–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Civerolo, E.L., 1975. Quantitative aspects of pathogenesis ofXanthomonas pruni, in peach leaves, Phytopathology 65: 258–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosse, J.E. & Garrett, C.M.E., 1970. Pathogenicity ofPseudomonas morsprunorum in relation to host specificity. J. gen. Microbiol. 62: 315–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosse, J.E., Goodman, R.M. & Shaffer, Jr., W.H., 1972. Leaf damage as a predisposing factor in the infection of apple shoots byErwinia amylovora. Phytopathology 62: 176–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Druett, H.A., 1952. Bacterial invasion. Nature (London) 170: 288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ercolani, G.L., 1967. Bacterial canker of tomato. II. Interpretation of the aetiology of the quantal response of tomato toCorynebacterium michiganense (E.F. Sm). Jens. by the hypothesis of independent action. Phytopathologia Medit. 6: 30–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ercolani, G.L., 1973. Two hypotheses on the aetiology of response of plants to phytopathogenic bacteria. J. gen. Microbiol. 74: 83–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ercolani, G.L., 1984. Infectivity titration with bacterial plant pathogens. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 22: 35–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Essenberg, M., Cason, Jr., E.T., Hamilton, B., Brinkerhoff, L.A., Gholson, R.K. & Richardson, P.E., 1979. Single cell colonies ofXanthomonas malvacearum in susceptible and immune cotton leaves and the local resistant response to colonies in immune leaves. Physiol. Pl. Path. 15: 53–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, P.H., 1948. The multiple-infection transformation. Ann. appl. Biol. 35: 412–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand, E.M., 1942. A micrurgical study of crown fall infection in tomato. J. agric. Res. 65: 45–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holliday, M.J., Keen, N.T. & Long, M., 1981. Cell death patterns and accumulation of fluorescent material in the hypersensitive response of soybean leaves toPseudomonas syringae pv.glycinea. Physiol. Pl. Path. 18: 279–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klement, Z., Farkas, G.L., & Lovrekovich, L., 1964. Hypersensitive reaction induced by phytopathogenic bacteria in the tobacco leaf. Phytopathology 54: 474–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layne, R.E.C., 1968. A quantitative local lesion bio-assay forCorynebacterium michiganense. Phytopathology 58: 534–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippincott, J.A. & Heberlein, G.T., 1965. The quantitative determination of the infectivity ofAgrobacterium tumefaciens. Am. J. Bot. 52: 856–863.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meynell, G.G. & Meynell, E., 1975. Theory and practice in experimental bacteriology. Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, London, New York, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérombelon, M.C.M., 1972. A quantitative method for assessing virulence ofErwinia carotovora var.carotovora andE. carotovora var.atroseptica and susceptibility to rotting of potato tuber tissue. In: Maas Geesteranus, H.P. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Plant Pathogenic Bacteria, Wageningen: 14–21 April, 1971. Pudoc, Wageningen, p. 299–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peto, S., 1953. A dose-response equation for the invasion of micro-organisms. Biometrics 9: 320–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strider, D.L., 1967. Survival studies with the tomato bacterial canker organism. Phytopathology 57: 1067–1071.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J.G. & Novacky, A., 1974. The quantitative relation between plant and bacterial cells involved in the hypersensitive reaction. Phytopathology 64: 885–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thyr, B.D., 1968. Bacterial canker of tomato: inoculum level needed for infection. Pl. Dis. Reptr 52: 741–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Plank, J.E., 1963. Plant diseases: epidemics and control. Academic Press, New York/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Plank, J.E., 1975. Principles of plant infection. Academic Press, New York/San Fransisco/London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boelema, B.H. Dose-response relationships between phytopathogenic bacteria and their hosts. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 91, 189–202 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02009679

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02009679

Additional keywords

Navigation